Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion: A Work in progress Report
PROCEEDINGS
Der-Thanq Victor Chen, University of Canterbury, New Zealand ; David Hung, National Institute of Education, Singapore
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Phoenix, Arizona, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-50-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA
Abstract
This paper describes and discusses the Project ROAD - Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion. The paper in particular discusses the mediating importance of rules to be well established for online discussions with the complementary emphasis of personal and collective representations for online discussions. In addition, the paper discusses the current work in progress with reference to the proposal for a multi-tier way of encouraging response to an invitation, better termed as "legitimacy to response". In essence, the paper is only an attempt to share the ideas of the project to the community of educators and researchers.
Citation
Chen, D.T.V. & Hung, D. (2003). Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion: A Work in progress Report. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2003--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2212-2215). Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/12318/.
© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Chen, D. & Hung, W. L. (2002). Personalised knowledge representations: the missing half of online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 279 -290.
- Cole, M. & Engeström, Y. (1991). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed ). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28 (1), 25- 42.
- Dewey, J. (1981). Experience and nature. In J.A. Boyston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953, Vol. 1 . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1925)
- Entwistle, N. & Marton, F. (1994). Knowledge objects: understandings constituted through intensive academic study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64,161 -178.
- Entwistle, N. (1995). Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations. Educational Psychologist, 30 , 47- 54.
- Jonassen, D. & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework fo r designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 47, 1, 61 -79.
- Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
- Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (revised edition) . Oxford University Press: Oxford.
- Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today's children, tomorrow's society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp.274 - 289). New York: Guilford.
- Suzuki, H. (2002). Community Incubator: Supporting Construction of On line Learner’s Community through Visualisation. Paper presented in ICCE 2002 conference, 3- 6 December 2002, Auckland, New Zealand.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References