You are here:

The Impact of Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Attitudes and Skills

, Texas Christian University, United States ; , , , University of North Texas, United States ; , University of Virginia, United States

JCMST Volume 33, Number 3, ISSN 0731-9258 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA


Researchers in this study looked at the effect of content-specific, technology-rich project-based learning activities on EC-8 pre-service teachers’ competencies and skills, as well as pre-service teacher’s attitudes toward science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Researchers employed a quantitative design involving participants in two sections of a required technology integration class which served as part of a teacher preparation sequence. Data were collected using the STEM Semantic Survey, Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment questionnaire, and Stages of Adoption of Technology in Education questionnaire at the beginning and end of the Fall 2011 semester. The findings provide evidence of changes in attitudes and skills of the pre-service educators after participating in the course. A specific focus is explored on the emerging relationships between STEM dispositions and technology integration competencies. Applications of these findings and directions for future studies are discussed.


Alexander, C., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T. & Bull, G. (2014). The Impact of Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Attitudes and Skills. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(3), 257-282. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Alexander, C. (2011). The Value of experience: the influence of technologybased steM learning Activities on Pre-service teacher Attitudes toward science, technology, engineering and Math. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 3789-3795). Chesapeake, VA:
  2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, nJ: lawrence earlbaum Associates. Cohen, J.D., smolkin, L., & Bull, G. (2011). Editorial: transmedia publishing. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 237242.
  3. Cox, C., & Carpenter, J. (1989). Improving attitudes toward teaching science and reducing science anxiety through increasing confidence in science ability in inservice elementary school teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 1(2), 14-34.
  4. Crookes, G. (1997). What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach? The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 67-79.
  5. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  6. Porter, A. (1989). A curriculum out of balance: the case of elementary school mathematics. Educational Researcher, 18(5), 9-15.
  7. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 2: do they really think differently? On the horizon, 9(6), 1-6.
  8. Williams, A., & Williams, P.J. (1994). Problem based learning: An approach to teaching technology. In ostwald, M. & Kingsland, A. (eds.). Research and development in Problem Based Learning, Vol. 2.: Reflection and Consolidation. Newcastle, Australia: Australian Problem based learning network. Weiss, I. (1987). Report of the 1985-86 national survey of science and Mathematics education (nsF report no. Ed292620). Durham, nC: Center for educational studies. Retrieved on 18 october 2011 from PdFs/ed292620.pdf.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Future Teachers’ Dispositions Toward Teaching With Geospatial Technologies

    Injeong Jo, Texas State University, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 16, No. 3 (2016) pp. 310–327

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact