You are here:

Open education resources and mobile technology to narrow the learning divide

; , Qatar University, Qatar

IRRODL Volume 14, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press


As the world becomes more digitized, there will be an increasing need to make available learning resources in electronic format for access by information and communication technologies. The question education will face is whether these learning resources will be available for learners to access at no cost or affordable cost so that there will be equity in access by anyone regardless of location, status, or background. With initiatives such as the Millennium Development Goals and Education For All by the United Nations (United Nations, 2011) learning materials must be available as open education resources to achieve the goals. Currently, most learning materials are available at a cost for people to purchase to learn, or they have to travel to a specific location (school or library) to access learning materials. In some parts of the world, especially in developing countries, these costs are prohibitive, preventing learners from achieving a basic level of education so that they can be productive in society and improve their quality of life (Bhavnani et al., 2008). Some would say that people in remote locations and developing countries do not have computers to access learning materials. It is true that many do not have desktop or laptop computers to access learning materials, but they have mobile devices and are now obtaining tablets with wireless capability to allow them to access learning materials from anywhere and at any time. These countries are bypassing the wired desktop stage and moving directly to wireless mobile technology (Bhavnani et al., 2008). Storing open education resources (OER) in electronic repositories will allow learners to access the resources using mobile technology. With mobile technologies, learners can complete coursework and assessments from anywhere and send their work to their tutors electronically and receive feedback (GSMA, 2011).


Ally, M. & Samaka, M. (2013). Open education resources and mobile technology to narrow the learning divide. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(2), 14-27. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca, Alberta: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved from
  2. Antoni, S. (2008). Open educational resources: The way forward (UNESCO report). Paris : UNESCO.
  3. Attwood, R. (2011). ‘OER university’ to cut cost of degree. Times Higher Education, 10 February 2011.
  4. Badarch, D., & Knyazeva, S. (2011, October). Open educational resources: Evidence from non-English speaking countries. Paper presented at the 24th ICDE World Conference on Open and Distance Learning, Bali, Indonesia.
  5. Bhavnani, A., Chiu, R.W., Janakiram, S., & Silarszky, P. (2008). The role of mobile phones in sustainable rural poverty reduction (World Development Report 2008). Retrieved from
  6. Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Open education, the long tail, and Learning 2.0.
  7. Cleveland-Innes, M., Ally, M., Wark, N., & Fung, T. (2012, October). Emotional presence and mobile learning: Learner-driven responses in a wireless world. Paper presented at the 7th EDEN Workshop, Leuven, Belgium. Commonwealth of Learning (COL). (2011). Guidelines for open educational resources (OER) in higher education. Retrieved from
  8. Corbeil, J.R., & Valdés-Corbeil, M.E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Your students are! Full paper proceedings and presentation at the 5th Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu.
  9. Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
  10. Evans, R., & Forbes, L. (2012). Mentoring the 'net generation': Faculty perspectives in health education. College Student Journal, June 2012, 397-404.
  11. GSMA. (2011). The mobile proposition for education. Retrieved from
  12. Havelock, B. (2004). Online community and professional learning in education: Research-based keys to sustainability. Association for the Advancement of Computing In Education, 12(1), 56-84.
  13. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., & Chinn, C.A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99– 107.
  14. ITU (2010). The world in 2010: Facts and figures. Retrieved from from
  15. Jeng, Y.-L., Wu, T.-T., Huang, Y.-M., Tan, Q., & Yang, S.J.H. (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educational Technology& Society, 13 (3), 3–11.
  16. Keegan, H., & Bell, F. (2011). YouTube as a repository: The creative practice of students as producers of open educational resources. Retrieved from & Article=456.
  17. Khan Academy. (2011). Retrieved from
  18. Kop, R., & Carroll, F. (2011). Cloud computing and creativity: Learning on a massive open online course. Retrieved from & Sp=articles & Inum=2 & Article=457
  19. Krist, K.G. (2011). Natural partners: Libraries and open source initiatives. Retrieved from
  20. McGreal, R. (2010). Mobile devices and the future of free education 2010. Retrieved from
  21. Mims, C. (2011). Samsung windfall: All of South Korea’s textbooks to go digital by 2015. Technology Review. Http://
  22. MIT (2011). MIT launches online learning initiative. MIT News. Retrieved from
  23. Moisey, S., Ally, M., & Spencer, B. (2006). Factors affecting the development and use of learning objects. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 143-161.
  24. Nikoia, S., & Armellinib, A. (2012). The OER mix in higher education: Purpose, process, product, and policy. Distance Education, 33(2), 165-184.
  25. OECD (2007). Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Retrieved from,3746,en_2649_35845581_38659497_1_1_1_1,00.html
  26. Olcott, D. (2012). OER perspectives: Emerging issues for universities. Distance Education, 33(2), 283-290
  27. OPAL. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus from resources to practices the OPAL Report 2011. Open Educational Quality Initiative. Retrieved from
  28. Open Content Alliance. (2012). Building a digital archive of global content for universal access. Retrieved from
  29. Pérez-Mateo, M., Maina, M.F., Guitert, M., & Romero, M. (2011). Learner generated content: Quality criteria in online collaborative learning. Retrieved from & Article=459
  30. Rhem, J. (1998). Problem-based learning: An introduction. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 8, (1), 1-4.
  31. Saw, G., & Todd, H. (2007, August). Library 3.0: Where art our skills? World library and Information: 73rd IFLA Conference and Council, Durban, SA.
  32. Stoyanova, N., & Kommers, P. (2002). Concept mapping as a medium of shared cognition in computer-supported collaborative problem-solving. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(1,2), 111–133.
  33. The World Bank. (2012). Mobile phone access reaches three quarters of planet's population. Retrieved from
  34. UNESCO (2000). Dakar Framework for Action, Education For All: Meeting our collective commitments. Retrieved from
  35. United Nations. (2011). The Millennium Development Goals report 2011. Retrieved from
  36. Van Rooij, S.W. (2009). Adopting open-source software applications in U.S. Higher education: Across-disciplinary review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 79 (2), 682–701.
  37. Wheeler, B., & Waggener, S. (2009). Shaping the promise of cloud computing for higher education. Educause Review, November/December 2009, 52-66.
  38. West, M. (2012). Mobile learning for teachers: Global themes. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning. Retrieved from
  39. World Digital Library. (2012). World Digital Library. Retrieved from
  40. Yardi, S. (2008). “Whispers in the classroom." Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected. In T. McPherson (Ed.), The John D. And Catherine T. MacArthur
  41. Young, B. (2009). Access to education in Africa: Mobile learning and open educational resources. Access to Knowledge: A Course Journal, 1(1), 1-7.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Factors Affecting the Participation of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in e-Learning and Their Satisfaction: A Quantitative Study

    Emilio Lago & Sara Acedo, National Distance Education University (UNED)

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 7 (Nov 29, 2017)

  2. The Faculty Members' Attitudes and Educational Practices of Mobile Learning in Higher Education Context

    Wenxi Schwab, Department of Professional Studies Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States; Chanikarnda Komaraku Nagara & Nicole Buse, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2015 (Oct 19, 2015) pp. 1620–1623

  3. Exploring the Roles of Social Participation in Mobile Social Media Learning: A Social Network Analysis

    Helmi Norman, Faculty of Science and Technology Bournemouth University Fern Barrow, Talbot Campus, Poole Dorset BH12 5BB United Kingdom; Norazah Nordin & Rosseni Din, Faculty of Education, National University of Malaysia; Mohamad Ally, Center for Distance Education Athabasca University; Huseyin Dogan, School of Design, Engineering, and Computing Faculty of Science and Technology Bournemouth University Fern Barrow, Talbot Campus, Poole Dorset BH12 5BB

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 4 (Nov 02, 2015)

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact