You are here:

Learning in Virtual Teams: Exploring the Student Experience
ARTICLE

, , , Deakin University, Australia

JITE-Research Volume 5, Number 1, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Full Text

Abstract

In 2005 an existing undergraduate course in project management was converted from face-to-face mode to wholly online mode. Wholly online mode means that there are no face-to-face classes at all, and all teaching and learning is facilitated through an online environment. The revised project management course was designed with an underlying problem-based learning (PBL) pedagogy and used a simulated, fictitious telecommunications company, United Enterprises (UE), as a case study learning resource. The students worked in virtual teams to complete online learning activities and to solve authentic project management tasks for UE. Employees of UE were available online to provide direction and answer further questions about the tasks. The overall research study used an action research methodology in which feedback was elicited from two groups of stakeholders involved in the project management course - students and teaching staff. The feedback was used to plan, develop and implement the new Information Technology (IT) Professional Practice course. This paper reports on the findings of three anonymous student surveys that were conducted after each of the main project management topics and tasks were completed. The surveys sought feedback in a number of areas. However, the feedback reported here relates specifically to student opinions about their experiences of working in virtual teams within the learning environment. Other aspects of the research, including student perceptions of UE and feedback from the teaching staff, are not reported here. Across the three surveys, most students indicated that they valued the opportunity to discuss various aspects of the course with peers and teaching staff online, and to interact with real-life employees of UE. Although discussion forums were the prescribed method for communication other forms of communication such as email, chat and face-to-face meetings were also used. According to the students, the best things about online group work were that it provides the flexibility of time and place; it allows communication and participation to be recorded; and is an ‘efficient’ way of working. The worst things about online group work were that communication is more difficult and that team members leave participation and submission to the last minute. While up to 15 percent of students did not like the experience of online group work at all, overall students were generally satisfied with this style of learning and enjoyed the experience of working collaboratively within a virtual team. The research has highlighted a number of areas where improvements can be made to the student experience of working in virtual teams. These improvements will be adopted in the development and delivery of the new course as part of the action research study.

Citation

Goold, A., Augar, N. & Farmer, J. (2006). Learning in Virtual Teams: Exploring the Student Experience. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 477-490. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved September 25, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M. & Nielsen, P. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94-97.
  2. Edwards, A. & Wilson J. (2004). Implementing virtual teams. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.
  3. Ellis, A., Carswell, L., Bernat, A., Deveaux, D., Frison, P., Meisalo, V. Et al. (1998). Resources, tools and techniques for problem based learning in computing. ITiCSE’98 Working Group Reports and Supplemental Proceedings.
  4. Fåhræus, E., Chamberlain, B., Bridgeman, N., Fuller, U. & Rujelj, J. (1999). Teaching with electronic collaborative learning groups. ITiCSE’99 Working Group Reports and Supplemental Proceedings, 31(4).
  5. Farmer, J. (2004). Communication dynamics: Discussion boards, weblogs and the development of communities of inquiry in online learning environments. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, 274-283.
  6. Goold, A. (2004). Problem-based learning in an online it professional practice course. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education, 65-71, Norfolk, VA, AACE.
  7. Hayes, J., Lethbridge, T. & Port, D. (2003). Evaluating individual contribution toward group software engineering projects. Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 622-627.
  8. Last, M. (2003). Understanding the group development process in global software teams. Proceedings of 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.
  9. Lynch, K. (2004). Collaborative work skills for the beginning IS professional. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 417-429. Available at http://articles.iisit.org/066lynch.pdf
  10. Pena-Schaff, J., Altman, W. & Stephenson, H. (2005). Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: Students’ attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 409-430.
  11. Learning in Virtual TeamsPMI Institute (2000). A guide to the project management book of knowledge (PMBOK ® guide) 2000 Edition. PA, USA: Project Management Institute.
  12. Powell, A., Piccoli, G. & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6-36.
  13. Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London, UK: SAGE.
  14. Redfern, S. & Naughton, N. (2002). Collaborative virtual environments to support communication and community in Internet-based distance education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(3), 201-209. Available at http://jite.org/documents/Vol1/v1n3p201-211.pdf
  15. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating. London, UK: Kogan Page.
  16. Singh, G., O’Donoghue, J. & Worton, H. (2005). A Study into the effects of elearning on higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2(1), 13-25.
  17. Terveen, L. & McDonald, D. (2005). Social matching: A framework and research agenda. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction, 12(3), 401-434.
  18. Whatley, J. (2004). An agent system to support student teams working online. Journal of Information Technology Education, 3, 53-63. Available at http://jite.org/documents/Vol3/v3p053-063-033.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links