You are here:

Using Games-Based eLearning Technologiesin Overcoming Difficulties in Teaching Information Systems
ARTICLE

, , University of Paisley, United Kingdom

JITE-Research Volume 5, Number 1, ISSN 1539-3585 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Full Text

Abstract

The contributions of this research center on two major areas: delineation of a new model of distance education in which the authors identify three generations of eLearning; and examination of how eLearning and games-based eLearning technologies can be used to enrich the Information Systems (IS) learning experiences of students with different learning styles. Before considering these contributions, some background material on eLearning is useful. eLearning has profoundly changed many aspects of society and, inevitably, it is having a significant impact on Higher Education, where it has now evolved from a marginal form of education to a commonly accepted alternative to traditional face-to-face education. The term can cover different delivery models ranging from courses that are delivered fully online (no face-to-face meetings) to courses that provide some face-to-face interaction and some online provision (sometimes called blended learning). Within this continuum interactive technologies can play a significant role in engaging the learner and providing a rich learning experience. The authors highlight some key educational merits of eLearning and games-based eLearning and highlight a number of examples where games-based eLearning has been applied elsewhere in the areas of management and administration, and business. This paper provides a new model for distance education in which the authors identify three generations of eLearning. The first generation was concerned mainly with the passive use of the Internet. The second generation was characterized by more advanced technologies such as eAssessment and Virtual Learning Environments. The current third generation of eLearning is focused more on collaborative learning environments based on areas such as reflective practice through tools like ePortfolios, blogs, wikis and interactive technologies such as games and simulations, as well as mLearning technologies. This paper also examines how eLearning and games-based eLearning technologies can be used to enrich the Information Systems (IS) learning experiences of students with different learning styles. The field of IS is a diverse and evolving area of study which draws upon a wide range of disciplines and skills. IS can be considered to be a wicked problem, characterized by incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements, with solutions that are difficult to recognize. As a result, teaching IS presents many difficulties and challenges since students often have problems and difficulty in handling ambiguity and vagueness often characterized with IS problem situations. In addition, students often have considerable difficulty in analysing problems where there is no single, simple well-known correct solution. As a result of these difficulties, the authors have utilised eLearning technologies and concepts and more latterly games-based eLearning as a means of overcoming these types of difficulties in teaching IS to students in a postgraduate MSc Management of eBusiness course. This is an area that does not appear to have looked into in much detail elsewhere in the IS and education literature. The authors consider that computer games have highly desirable qualities and build on theories such as motivation, constructivism, situated learning and problem-based learning. In this paper, the authors describe the development of the eLearning and games-based eLearning applications as applied to the MSc students and highlight the contribution that such technologies can make to overcome the difficulties in teaching IS such as: • providing a challenging and complex real-world environment within which to apply their theoretical knowledge; • overcoming difficulties in dealing with ambiguity and vagueness; • developing and applying transferable analytical and problem-solving skills; • developing self confidence and increased motivation, and • allowing students time to reflect upon their practice and develop metacognitive strategies capable of adapting to new and evolving situations. The final section of paper identifies areas of further direction such as developing a less sophisticated virtual games environment that is easier to adapt and is less resource intensive and thus better able to meet the needs and financial constraints found in higher education.

Citation

Connolly, T. & Stansfield, M. (2006). Using Games-Based eLearning Technologiesin Overcoming Difficulties in Teaching Information Systems. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 459-476. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved March 25, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the future of learning: An innovative (and perhaps revolutionary) approach to e-Learning. New York: Pfeiffer.
  2. Armarego, J. (2002). Advanced software design: A case in problem-based learning. Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 25–27 February 2002, Covington, Kentucky, USA, pp. 44–54.
  3. Becta. (2001). Computer games in education project. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency, Retrieved 23 September 2004 from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/research.cfm?section=1 & Id=2846
  4. Berge, Z.L. & Collins, M. (1995). (Eds.) Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  5. Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, pp. 229 – 270, Cambridge,
  6. Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play, and games. Free Press, New York.
  7. Chapman, C., Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005). Strong community, deep learning: exploring the link. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 217 – 230.
  8. Chen, G.D., Shen, G.Y., Ou, K.L., & Liu, B. (1998). Promoting motivation and eliminating disorientation for web based courses by a multi-user game, In Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 98 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia and World conference on Educational Telecommunications, June 20-25, 1998, Germany.
  9. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  10. Connolly, T.M., McLellan, E., Stansfield, M.H., Ramsay J., & Sutherland J. (2004). Applying computer games concepts to teaching database analysis and design. International Conference on Computer Games, AI, Design and Education, Reading, UK, November 2004.
  11. Crookall, D., Oxford, R.L., & Saunders, D. (1987). Towards a reconceptualization of simulation: From representation to reality. Simulation/Games for Learning, 17, 147-171.
  12. Crookall, D. & Saunders, D. (1989). Towards an integration of communication and simulation, In D. Crookall & D. Saunders (Eds.), Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  13. Cruickshank, D.R. (1980). Classroom games and simulations. Theory into Practice, 19(1), 75-80.
  14. DeGrace, P. & Hulet Stahl, L. (1998). Wicked problems, righteous solutions: A catalog of modern engineering paradigms. Prentice Hall.
  15. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J.E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
  16. Greenblat, C. (1981). Teaching with simulation games: A review of claims and evidence. In R.E. Duke & C. Greenblat (Eds.), Principles of practice of gaming-simulation, London: Sage Publications. Connolly& Stansfield
  17. Illeris, K. (2002). The three dimensions of learning: Contemporary learning theory in the tension field between the cognitive, the emotional and the social. Copenhagen: Roskilde University Press.
  18. Katzeff, C. (2000). The design of interactive media for learners in an organisational setting– the state of the art. In Proceedings for NordiCHI 2000 (Stockholm, Oct. 23-25).
  19. Kriz, W.C. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation& Gaming, 34(4), 495-511.
  20. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
  22. Leemkuil, H., de Jong, T., de Hoog, R., & Christoph, N. (2003). KM QUEST: A collaborative Internetbased simulation game. Simulation& Gaming, 34(1), 89-111.
  23. LTSN. (2003). A guide for learning technologists. Learning and teaching support network, LTSN Generic Centre, E-Learning Series 4.
  24. Malone, T.W. & Lepper, M.R. (1987). Making Learning fun: A Taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, learning and instruction. Volume 3: Cognitive and affective process analysis (pp. 223-253). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
  25. Mathiassen, L. (1999) Reflective systems development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 10(1), 85-101.
  26. Mathiassen, L. & Purao, S. (2002) Educating reflective systems practitioners. Information Systems Journal, 12, 81-102.
  27. Mayo, P., Donnelly, M.B., Nash, P.P., & Schwartz, R.W. (1993). Student perceptions of tutor effectiveness in problem based surgery clerkship. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 5(4), 227-233.
  28. Nipper, S. (1989). Third generation distance learning and computer conferencing. In R. Mason& R. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 53-73). Oxford: Pergamon.
  29. Owen, M. (2004). The myth of the digital divide. Nesta FutureLab Viewpoint Article 26, Retrieved 23 October 2005 from http://www.nestafuturelab.org/viewpoint/art26.htm
  30. Postman, N. & Weingartner, C. (1971). Teaching as a subversive activity. Penguin, London.
  31. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game based learning. McGraw-Hill.
  32. Research Forum. (2005). The relationship between research and teaching in institutions in higher education, Forum’s advice to ministers on teaching and research. Higher Education Research Forum, Retrieved 20 October 2005 from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/hegateway/hereform/heresearchforum/index.cfmShaffer,D.W.,Squire,K.T.,Halverson,R.,&Gee,J.P.(2005).Videogamesandthefutureoflearning.WisconsinCenterforEducationalResearch(WCER)WorkingpaperNo.2005-4,June2005.Http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2005_4.pdf
  33. Stansfield, M., McLellan, E., & Connolly, T.M. (2004). Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to-face class delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education, 3, 173-188.
  34. Taylor, J. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. Keynote Address presented at the 20th ICDE World Conference, Düsseldorf, Germany, April 2001. Game-Based Technologies in Overcoming Difficulties in Teaching Information Systems
  35. Waks, L.J. (2001). Donald Schon’s philosophy of design and design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 37–51.
  36. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W.S. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Biographies Thomas Connolly is a Professor in the School of Computing at the

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Links