You are here:

The Affordance of Anchored Discussion for the Collaborative Processing of Academic Texts
ARTICLE

, ,

IJCCL Volume 1, Number 3, ISSN 1556-1607

Abstract

A system for "anchored discussion" is compared with a system for traditional forum discussion (Blackboard), and their collaborative and communicative affordances for the collaborative processing of academic texts are investigated. Results show that discussion in the system for anchored discussion is more directed at processing the meaning of texts than discussion in the traditional forum, which is more oriented towards the sharing of personal opinions and experiences. This difference in orientation produces a more constructive collaboration in the system for anchored discussion, versus a more debate-like collaboration in the forum discussion. Additionally, while messages in the traditional forum resemble usual discussion or email conversation and contain social and regulative comments, discussion in the system for anchored discussion is seen to be more efficient and "to-the-point." We conclude that for collaborative text comprehension by undergraduate students, anchored discussion might be more suitable than traditional forum discussion. Finally, the observed differences can be explained by the stronger defined collaborative context in the system for anchored discussion, which focuses participants' collaborative intentions and their frames of reference.

Citation

van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W. & Simons, P.R.J. (2006). The Affordance of Anchored Discussion for the Collaborative Processing of Academic Texts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 339-357. Retrieved August 4, 2020 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords