Co-Reflection in Online Learning: Collaborative Critical Thinking as Narrative
IJCCL Volume 1, Number 2, ISSN 1556-1607
This article presents findings from a comparative case study of the learning experiences of two graduate students in an online action research course. The key roles played by reflection and co-reflection, an emerging concept, are identified through the use of narrative analysis. Co-reflection is a collaborative critical thinking process mediated by language, broadly construed to include all meaningful signs. Two types of co-reflection are proposed: tacit and active. Regardless of type, the evidence shows that co-reflection involves cognitive and affective interactions in synergy with relationship building. To the study of group cognition, this study contributes evidence of the potential of co-reflection as a core process. The simple, flexible software tools used in the course (wiki-style collaborative software and simple email and chat programs) effectively supported inquiry learning and co-reflection by allowing learners to freely and easily create their own web pages and to adapt the tools for their different communication and learning styles.
Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-Reflection in Online Learning: Collaborative Critical Thinking as Narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203-228.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Rolf Baltzersen & Rolf Baltzersen
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 26, No. 6 (Jan 01, 2010)
Jorge Reyna, University of Technology Sydney, Australia; Scarlet An, The University of Notre Dame, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2017 (Jun 20, 2017) pp. 1302–1310
Yigal Rosen & Rikki Rimor, Open University of Israel, Israel
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 5, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2009) pp. 187–195
Learning Trajectory for Transforming Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics and Science with Digital Image and Video Technologies
Margaret Niess & Henry Gillow-Wiles, Oregon State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 864–871
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.