Abstract

The conflict monitoring model of M. M. Botvinick, T. S. Braver, D. M. Barch, C. S. Carter, and J. D. Cohen (2001) triggered several research programs investigating various aspects of cognitive control. One problematic aspect of the Botvinick et al. model is that there is no clear account of how the cognitive system knows where to intervene when conflict is detected. As a result, recent findings of task-specific and context-specific (e.g., item-specific) adaptation are difficult to interpret. The difficulty with item-specific adaptation was recently pointed out by C. Blais, S. Robidoux, E. F. Risko, and D. Besner (2007), who proposed an alternative model that could account for this. However, the same problem of where the cognitive system should intervene resurfaces in a different shape in this model, and it has difficulty in accounting for the Gratton effect, a hallmark item-nonspecific effect. The authors of the current article show how these problems can be solved when cognitive control is implemented as a conflict-modulated Hebbian learning rule. (Contains 2 figures and 1 footnote.)

Citation

Verguts, T. & Notebaert, W. (2008). Hebbian Learning of Cognitive Control: Dealing with Specific and Nonspecific Adaptation. Psychological Review, 115(2), 518-525. Retrieved May 17, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/102890/.

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

• Behavior Theories
• Brain
• Cognitive Psychology
• Computer Simulation
• Conflict
• learning theories
• models
• Neuropsychology
• Reaction Time
• Reinforcement
• Self Control
• Stimuli