The Effect of Student Choice of Online Discussion Format on Tiered Achievement and Student Satisfaction
Journal of Research on Technology in Education Volume 39, Number 4, ISSN 1539-1523
This study investigated whether providing students with the choice of chat versus threaded discussion boards for online discourse is an effective instructional strategy in terms of student learning and satisfaction. The sample was teacher education students enrolled in face-to-face (FTF) and online sections of one undergraduate foundations course. Both sections required participation in online text-based discussion. Comparison groups included course format (FTF vs. online), discussion format (chat vs. discussion board) and discussion format option (choice vs. no choice). Results reveal that students' choice of discussion format was influenced by the trait of academic introversion-extraversion but not by the instructional environment (FTF or online) in which they enrolled. In addition, providing the choice of discussion format to students enhanced course satisfaction and, while some differences were found in cognitive achievement, the results were weak. (Contains 4 figures and 6 tables.)
Lin, S. & Overbaugh, R.C. (2007). The Effect of Student Choice of Online Discussion Format on Tiered Achievement and Student Satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 399-415.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
The Effects of Types of Interactions on Students’ Quality of Discussions and Discussion Satisfactions
Ninghua Han & Steven Crooks, Texas Tech University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 498–501
Carolyn Bishop & Rebecca Hong, Biola University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 1106–1111
Bethany Smith & Lori Holcomb, NC State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 2970–2973
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.