You do not have access to view this presentation.

You are here:

eLearning Reality, ID Processes and Pedagogical Objects
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , LICEF /CIRTA Research Centre, Télé-université,, Canada

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-56-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Given the increased importance of learning objects for designing, producing and delivering online courses, concerns arise about reusability and more specifically how practitioners could effectively use them to facilitate the design process. To shed some light on practitioners' use of existing learning resources and how these may potentially affect their ID processes, transcripts of six interviews with practitioners were analyzed from this point of view. Key results from this study provide a list of potential learning objects and how their use might facilitate the ID process. Further, five main tendencies could be discerned from these transcripts. These are discussed in light of general recommendations that can be made in terms of ID processes using pedagogical objects in innovative eLearning contexts. This paper presents a brief conceptual framework, research objectives, the method, followed by results, ideas for future research perspectives and a general conclusion.

Citation

Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Ruelland, D., de la Teja Angeles, I., Henri, F. & Couture, M. (2005). eLearning Reality, ID Processes and Pedagogical Objects. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4485-4491). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 28, 2023 from .

© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Couture, M., Henri, F., Ruelland, D., & Chabour, S. (2003). Towards learning object-based instructional design (LORNET Project 6.3 – Year 1 Report). Montreal: Télé-université.
  2. Douglas, I. (2001). Instructional Design Based on Reusable Learning Objects: Applying Lessons of Object-Oriented Software Engineering to Learning System Design. Paper presented at the 31 st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10-13, Reno, NV, USA.
  3. Duval, E. (1999). An open infrastructure for learning (the ARIADNE project): Share and reuse without boundaries. In E. Ramo (Ed.), Proceedings of Enabling Network-Based Learning, Helsinki, Finland, June 2-5.
  4. Flamand, P. (2004). Les objets d’apprentissage: au-de là de la technologie, la pédagogie. C l i c, 54. Retrieved December 17, 2004 from http://clic.ntic.org/clic54/objets.html
  5. Klein, J.D., Spector, J.M, Grabowski, B., & De la Teja, I. (2004). Instructor Competencies. Standards for Faceto-Face, Online and Blended Setttings. CT, USA: AECT, Information Age Publishing.
  6. Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning. Educational Technology& Society, 7 (3), 97-111.
  7. Lowerison, G., Gallant, G., & Boyd, G. (2003). Learning objects in distance education: Addressing issues of quality, learner control and accessibility. In CADE-ACED Conference Proceedings. Retrieved December 20, 2004 from http://www.cade-aced2003.ca/conference_proceedings/Gallant.pdf Maina, M., Gagné, P., & Henri, F. (2003b). Énoncés des besoins-CONCEPTION/ MÉDIATISATION: catégorisation – généralisation. (Research Report). Montréal: LICEF Research Centre.
  8. Mills, S. (2002). Learning about Learning Objects with Learning Objects. Paper presented at the SITE 2002 Conference, Nashville, TN. Retrieved December 20, 2004 from AliveTek Website, http://www.alivetek.com/learningobjects/site_paper.htmMorrison,D.(2004).WhatDoInstructionalDesignersDesign?PaperpresentedattheeLearningNetwork,London,January.RetrievedDefrome-LearningCenterWebSite,http://www.elearningcentre.co.uk/eclipse/Resources/isd.htm
  9. Paquette, G. (2004). Instructional Engineering in Networked Environments. Collection: Instructional Technology and Training Series, USA: Pfeiffer.
  10. Paquette, G., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Miara. A., & Guérette, L. (2003). The Explor@-2 Learning Object Manager. In R. McGreal (Ed.), Online education using learning objects. London: Routledge/Falmer.
  11. Pernin, J-P. (2003). Quels modèles et quels outils pour la scénarisation d’activités dans les nouveaux dispositifs d’apprentissage? Paper presented at Séminaire TIC, nouveaux métiers et nouveaux dispositifs d’apprentissage, Lyon, France, November 19.
  12. Tozman, R. (2004). The New Paradigm for Instructional Design. Retrieved December 17, 2004 from http://www.thinkingcap.info/content/PDF/NewParadigmInstructionalDesign.pdf Wiley, D.A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. Retrieved December 20, 2004 from http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References