You are here:

Feeling the Feed: Reflections (Confessions?) of an Online Teacher on Transitioning from Threaded Discussion to Social Media
PROCEEDINGS

, Griffith University, Australia

Global Learn, in Online, Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

This paper presents the background and events to date of a continuing case study of a teacher adapting to social media, from the point of view of the online teacher. It describes the ongoing challenges of using now ‘traditional’ threaded discussion boards, and details events leading to a simultaneous design experiment conducting an instructional activity in the traditional threaded discussion and a social media platform. It further describes how this experiment has led to trialing full scale teaching in multiple units of study supported only by the social media platform. Observations and reflections are drawn from the case experience

Citation

Fletcher, M. (2012). Feeling the Feed: Reflections (Confessions?) of an Online Teacher on Transitioning from Threaded Discussion to Social Media. In Proceedings of Global Learn 2012: Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 27-36). Online,: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bonk, C. (2008) YouTube Anchors and Enders: The Use fo Shared Online Video as a Macrocontext for Learning. Paper presented at the AERA 2008 Annual Meeting, New York, NY
  2. Clark, C., Werth, L. & Ahten, S. (2012). Cyber-bullying and Incivility in the Online Learning Environment, Part 1: Addressing Faculty and Student Perceptions. Nurse Educator.37(4), July/August 2012, p 150–156.
  3. Coates, H. (2006). Student Engagement in Campus-based and Online Education. Routledge. New York
  4. Christensen, C. & Eyring, H. (2011). The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out.
  5. DeMillo, R. (2011). Abelard to Apple: The Fate of American Colleges and Universities. The MIT Press. Cambridge. The MIT Press. Cambridge.-34 DASHDASH
  6. Diaz, V., Golas, J., & Gautsch, S. (2010) Privacy Considerations in Cloud-Based Teaching and Learning Environments. Educause Learning Initiative.ELI Paper 3 2010.
  7. Greenlaw, R. & Hepp, E. (1999). In-line/On-line: Fundamentals of the Internet and the WorldWide Web. McGraw-Hill. Boston.
  8. Klingberg, T. (2009). The Overflowing Brain: Information Overload and the Limits of Working Memory. Oxford University Press. New York.
  9. Kuh, G.D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  10. Lewin, T. (2012). Instruction for Massess Knocks Down Campus Walls. The New York Times. March 4, 2012.
  11. Lynch, M. (2002). The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom
  12. Metcalf, D. (2006) mLearning: Mobile Learning and Performance in the Palm of Your Hand. HRD Press. Amherst.
  13. Morgan, K., Cameron, B., & Williams, K. (2009). Student perceptions of social task development in online group project work. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 285-294,320.
  14. Potter, L. (2011). JPoll. Podcast. Http://itunes.apple.com/au/itunes-u/jpoll/id505901534. Accessed 25 Sep 2012.
  15. Race, P. (2007). The Lecturer’s Tool: A Practical guide to Assessment Learning and Teaching. Routledge. New York.
  16. Rust, C., O'Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: how the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment& Evalutation in Higher Education, 30(3). Pp 231 – 240
  17. Russ, C. (2007) Online Crowds-Extraordinary Mass Behavior on the Internet (2007). Proceedings of I-MEDIA ’07 and I-SEMANTICS ’07, September 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1620803
  18. Rutherford, C. (2010). Using online social media to support preservice student engagement. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4). Available http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no4/rutherford_1210.htm
  19. Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating. Routledge. London.
  20. Schutt, M. (2008). The effects of instructor immediacy in online learning environments. (University of San Diego and San Diego State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Document ID 304705143.
  21. Tseng, H., Wang, C., Ku, H., & Sun, L. (2009). Key factors in online collaboration and their relationship to teamwork satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2), 195-206,251-252.
  22. Uys, P. (2010). Implementing an open source learning management system: A critical analysis of change strategies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 26(7), pp. 980-995
  23. Yammer (2010). Http://www.yammer.com [viewed 22 Sept Nov 2012]

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides