You are here:

Supporting Self-Regulation in Student-Centered Web-Based Learning Environments
Article

, , George Mason University, United States

International Journal on E-Learning, in Norfolk, VA ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

Numerous benefits of student-centered web-based learning environments have been documented in the literature; however the effects on student learning are questionable, particularly for low self-regulated learners primarily because these environments require students to exercise a high degree of self-regulation to succeed. Currently few guidelines exist on how college instructors should incorporate self-regulated strategies using web-based pedagogical tools. The scope of this paper is to (a) discuss the significance of self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments; (b) demonstrate how instructional designers and educators can provide opportunities for student self-regulation using web-based pedagogical tools; and (c) redefine the role of the instructor to support the development of independent, self-regulated learners through the use of web-based pedagogical tools.

Citation

Dabbagh, N. & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting Self-Regulation in Student-Centered Web-Based Learning Environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40-47. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 27, 2023 from .

© 2004 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretence Hall.
  2. Berge, Z.L. (1999, January-February). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, pp.5-11.
  3. Besser, H., & Bonn, M. (1997). Interactive distance-independent
  4. Dabbagh, N. (2000). Protocols and rubrics for conducting structured online discussion forums. [Online]. Available: http://mason.gmu .edu/~ndabbagh/wblg/online-protocol.html
  5. Dabbagh, N. (2001). Concept mapping as a mindtool for critical thinking. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(2), 16 – 23. Dabbagh, N. (2002, March/April). Using a web-based course
  6. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2003). Do web-based pedagogical
  7. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging
  8. Driscoll, M.P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  9. Hannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99.
  10. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L.D. (2001). Educational research in the
  11. Herring, M.C., & Smaldino, S.E. (1998). Planning for interactive distance education: A handbook. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  12. The Institute for Higher Education Policy (2000, April). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Retrieved January 29, 2004 from http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf
  13. Keefer, J.A., & Karabenick, S.A. (1998). Help seeking in the
  14. Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and test performance: A self-regulatory analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 70(2), 101-113
  15. Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2002). Examining college students’ self-efficacy beliefs and perceived threat to seek help in traditional and distance learning settings. Paper presented at
  16. McLoughlin, C., & Hollingworth, R. (2001). The weakest link: Is
  17. Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129-150.
  18. New Media Development (2001). TeleEducation NB. Retrieved June 7, 2001 from: http://teleeducation.nb.ca/firstpage.cfm
  19. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (1995). Developing effective hypermedia instructional materials. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 8-22.
  20. Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
  21. Riel, M., & Harasim, L. (1994). Research perspectives on network learning. Journal of Machine-Mediated Learning, 4, 91-114.
  22. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London, UK: Kogan Page.
  23. Thach, E.C., & Murphy, K.L. (1995). Competencies for distance
  24. Willis, B. (2001). Engineering outreach at the university of Idaho,
  25. Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
  26. Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M.Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Seidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications
  27. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases
  28. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Developing writing
  29. Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections