You are here:

Supporting Self-Regulation in Student-Centered Web-Based Learning Environments
Article

, , George Mason University, United States

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 3, Number 1, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Numerous benefits of student-centered web-based learning environments have been documented in the literature; however the effects on student learning are questionable, particularly for low self-regulated learners primarily because these environments require students to exercise a high degree of self-regulation to succeed. Currently few guidelines exist on how college instructors should incorporate self-regulated strategies using web-based pedagogical tools. The scope of this paper is to (a) discuss the significance of self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments; (b) demonstrate how instructional designers and educators can provide opportunities for student self-regulation using web-based pedagogical tools; and (c) redefine the role of the instructor to support the development of independent, self-regulated learners through the use of web-based pedagogical tools.

Citation

Dabbagh, N. & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting Self-Regulation in Student-Centered Web-Based Learning Environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40-47. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretence Hall.
  2. Berge, Z.L. (1999, January-February). Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, pp.5-11.
  3. Besser, H., & Bonn, M. (1997). Interactive distance-independent
  4. Dabbagh, N. (2000). Protocols and rubrics for conducting structured online discussion forums. [Online]. Available: http://mason.gmu .edu/~ndabbagh/wblg/online-protocol.html
  5. Dabbagh, N. (2001). Concept mapping as a mindtool for critical thinking. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(2), 16 – 23. Dabbagh, N. (2002, March/April). Using a web-based course
  6. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2003). Do web-based pedagogical
  7. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging
  8. Driscoll, M.P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  9. Hannafin, M., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99.
  10. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L.D. (2001). Educational research in the
  11. Herring, M.C., & Smaldino, S.E. (1998). Planning for interactive distance education: A handbook. Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  12. The Institute for Higher Education Policy (2000, April). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Retrieved January 29, 2004 from http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf
  13. Keefer, J.A., & Karabenick, S.A. (1998). Help seeking in the
  14. Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and test performance: A self-regulatory analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 70(2), 101-113
  15. Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2002). Examining college students’ self-efficacy beliefs and perceived threat to seek help in traditional and distance learning settings. Paper presented at
  16. McLoughlin, C., & Hollingworth, R. (2001). The weakest link: Is
  17. Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129-150.
  18. New Media Development (2001). TeleEducation NB. Retrieved June 7, 2001 from: http://teleeducation.nb.ca/firstpage.cfm
  19. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (1995). Developing effective hypermedia instructional materials. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 8-22.
  20. Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
  21. Riel, M., & Harasim, L. (1994). Research perspectives on network learning. Journal of Machine-Mediated Learning, 4, 91-114.
  22. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London, UK: Kogan Page.
  23. Thach, E.C., & Murphy, K.L. (1995). Competencies for distance
  24. Willis, B. (2001). Engineering outreach at the university of Idaho,
  25. Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339.
  26. Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M.Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Seidner (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications
  27. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases
  28. Zimmerman, B.J., & Kitsantas, A. (1999). Developing writing
  29. Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D.H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. The Impact of Self-Regulation Strategies on Student Success and Satisfaction in an Online Course

    Fethi Inan, Texas Tech University, United States; Erman Yukselturk, Kirikkale University, Turkey; Murat Kurucay, Bulent Ecevit University, Turkey; Raymond Flores, Texas Tech University, United States

    International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 16, No. 1 (February 2017) pp. 23–32

  2. Metacognitive Skills Development: A Mobile Learning Approach among Pre Service Teachers

    Eunice Eyitayo Olakanmi & T. Mishack Gumbo, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa, South Africa

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2016 (Jun 28, 2016) pp. 1258–1265

  3. Student Satisfaction and Critical Thinking in 2D vs. 3D On-line Postsecondary Music Curriculum

    Mary Ingraham, Patricia Boechler, Luis Marin & Erik deJong, University of Alberta, Canada

    Global Learn 2016 (Apr 28, 2016) pp. 323–332

  4. Helping Students become Successful Online Learners: Lessons Learned from Eight Semesters of an Action Research Study

    Jane Kenney, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, United States; Ellen Newcombe, West Chester University, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 298–303

  5. Integrating Blogs as Cognitive Learning Tools: Designing and Evaluating Real Blogging

    Nikleia Eteokleous-Grigoriou, Frederick University Cyprus, Cyprus; Efi Nisiforou, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (Mar 25, 2013) pp. 3867–3876

  6. The relationship between flexible and self-regulated learning in open and distance universities

    Per Bergamin, Fernfachhochschule Schweiz; Simone Ziska, Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz (FHNW) Pädagogische Hochschule; Egon Werlen & Eva Siegenthaler, Fernfachhochschule Schweiz

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 13, No. 2 (Apr 02, 2012) pp. 101–123

  7. Teenagers and Multiculturalism: Instilling a New Learning Culture through Social-Virtual Activities

    Nikleia Eteokleous, Frederick University Cyprus/ MYTecC, Cyprus; Ushi Krausz & Yarden Leal, Peres Center for Peace, Israel; Osnat Emanuel, Seriously Kidding™, Israel

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 5267–5275

  8. Towards Assessing Pedagogical Support in Learning Management Systems: Validation of a Multidimensional Scale

    Sharon Bratt & Janet McCracken, Simon Fraser University, Canada

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008 (Nov 17, 2008) pp. 3604–3611

  9. A Framework for Assessing the Pedagogical Utility of Learning Management Systems

    Sharon Bratt, Simon Fraser University, Canada

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (Oct 15, 2007) pp. 218–225

  10. A Model of a Decision Making Planning Strategy for the Development of Online Courses for Teacher Education Program

    Yahya Matsom, Valdosta State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (Mar 19, 2006) pp. 1274–1278

  11. E-Tools for Self-Regulated Learning: Retaining “NetGen” Freshmen Using Technology

    David Beach, Matthew Humphrey, Karolina Caran, Lisa Marshak, Maureen Madden, Carolyn Iguchi & Nada Dabbagh, George Mason University, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (October 2005) pp. 2799–2804

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.