You are here:

Learning Designs: A Pre-service Teacher Perspective
PROCEEDINGS

, Australian Catholic University, Australia ; , University of Queensland, Australia

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Lisbon, Portugal ISBN 978-1-880094-89-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

Novice teachers are often looking for good learning designs on which to model their own teaching and learning environments. Additionally, they need the opportunity to discuss and reflect on their original designs and the designs of others to gain confidence and skills in teaching (Cameron, 2006; Kearney, 2007). However, as the research this paper describes found, our pre-service teachers are not been given this opportunity in their practicum schools. Encouraging these pre-service teachers to share and discuss their learning designs will facilitate these inexperienced teachers’ evaluation of the efficiencies, value and limitations of the individual learning designs and their experience in using them. If given this opportunity, these teachers would then take these insights with them into their professional lives.

Citation

Cameron, L. & Campbell, C. (2011). Learning Designs: A Pre-service Teacher Perspective. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2011--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2869-2875). Lisbon, Portugal: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bower, R. & Appleby, D. (2005). Methodologies in practice. In J. Dalziel, R. Philip& J. Clare (Eds.), The COLIS Project: Collaborative online learning and information services, (pp. 121-137). Macquarie University E-Learning Centre of Excellence:
  2. Donald, C., Blake, A., Girault, I., Datt, A., & Ramsay, E. (2009). Approaches to learning design: past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter. Distance Education. Vol. 30, No. @, August 2009, 179-199.
  3. Elliott, K. & Sweeney, K. (2007). Quantifying the reuse of learning objects. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/elliott.pdfFoster,N.F.&Gibbons,S.(2005).Understandingfacultytoimprovecontentrecruitmentforinstitutionalrepositories.D-LibMagazine.11(1).RetrievedSeptember21,2007fromhttp://www.dlib.org//dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html
  4. Foster, N.F. & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine. 11(1). Retrieved December 10, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org//dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html
  5. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern language as and design practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 82-101.
  6. Gray, K & McNaught, C. (2001). Evaluation of achievements from collaboration in a learning technology mentoring program, in G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught& T. Petrovic (Eds.). Meeting at the crossroads, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Retrieved 11 December 2007, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pubs/index.html
  7. Kearney, M. & Young, K. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of LAMS as a teaching tool. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/Kearney.
  8. Koper, E.J.R. (2003). Combining reusable learning resources and services to pedagogical purposeful units of learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning (pp. 46-59). London: Kogan Page.
  9. Laurillard, D. & McAndrew, P. (2002). Virtual teaching tools: Bringing academics closer to the design of e-learning. Keynote address in Proceedings of the Networked Learning Conference, 24–26 March 2002, School of Education, University of Sheffield and Lancaster University, UK.
  10. Lloyd, K. & Butcher, M.(2006). Reusing learning designs: Role play adaptations of the Mekong and Ha Long Bay e-Sim. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who’s Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 465–468). Sydney: Sydney University
  11. McAndrew, P., Weller, M. & Barrett-Baxendale, M. (2006). Learning design and service-oriented architectures: A mutual dependency? Journal of Learning Design, 1(6), 51-60.
  12. McNaught, C. (2003). Identifying the complexity of factors in the sharing and reuse of resources. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning. Kogan Page: London and Sterling, VA. Chapter 16, pp. 199 – 211.
  13. Pennell, R. (2007). Sharing teaching resources. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/pennell-poster.pdf
  14. Philip, R. (2007). Adaptable and reusable learning designs: Will they be shared? Ed-Media World Conference on Educational Media, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vancouver, Canada, 25 June – 29 June 2007, 2980-2985.
  15. Taylor, P. & Richardson, A. (2001). Validating scholarship in university teaching: Constructing a national scheme for external peer review of ICT-based teaching and learning resources. Evaluations and Investigations Programme. DETYA, Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.