You are here:

Online Peer Evaluation as an Assessment and Collaborative Learning Approach: Perspectives from Two Students
PROCEEDINGS

, , , Indiana State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper discusses an online peer evaluation approach that was applied to a hybrid fundamental Instructional Design course. The peer evaluation does not just serve as an assessment of peers’ projects but also creates an active collaborative learning environment through critique and debate. This learning experience helped students improve evaluation capabilities and enhance learning performance as well. What are students’ perspectives on this approach? The paper will discuss pros and cons of this online peer evaluation approach from two graduate students’ perspectives.

Citation

Lai, F.Q., Snapp, K. & Burk, C. (2011). Online Peer Evaluation as an Assessment and Collaborative Learning Approach: Perspectives from Two Students. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 437-441). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Al-Barakat, A. & Al-Hassan, O. (2009, November). Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers’ preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 399-413.
  2. Keller, J.M. (1984). Use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K.E. Shaw (Ed.), Aspects of educational technology XVII. Staff development and career updating. New York: Nicholes.
  3. Mayer, R.E. (2008). Learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  4. Ozogul, G., Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. (2008). Teacher, self and peer evaluation of lesson plans written by preservice teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 181–201.
  5. Smith, P.L. & Ragan T.J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley& Sons, Inc. Vu, T.T. & Dall’Alba, G. (2007, October). Students’ experience of peer assessment in a professional course. Assessment& Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 541–556.
  6. Zhang, S. (1995). Re-examining the affective advantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209–222.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides