You are here:

E-Learning Impact: Training of Public Safety Officers PROCEEDINGS

, Chicago Police Department, United States ; , Argosy University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Orlando, Florida, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-83-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Private and public sectors are being pressured to utilize new teaching platforms to increase and maximize training efficiency. ELearning has made huge gains in filling the void that exists between the needs of organizations and the available resources. Some variables that must be taken into account when considering the implementation of a Learning Management System (LMS) are the number of users that will be using the new training platform as well as other factors like opportunity costs. The Chicago Police Department launched a Learning Management System in 2008 and delivered a department-wide training initiative of a course called AIRA (Automated Incident Reporting Application)

Citation

Frausto, J. & Torres, E. (2010). E-Learning Impact: Training of Public Safety Officers. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2010--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 96-102). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. AbuShawar, B., & Al-Sadi, J. (2010). Learning Management Systems: Are They Knowledge Management Tools?. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(1), 4-10.
  2. Chicago Police Department (2003). Information Services Division. AIRA-Automated Incident Reporting Application User’s Guide. Chicago Police Department 2007 Annual Report, 2008.
  3. Concannon, F., Flynn, A., & Campbell, M. (2005). What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 501-512.
  4. Kim, S., & Lee, M. (2008). Validation of an evaluation model for learning management systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 284-294. Doi:10.1111/J.1365-2729.2007.00260.X.L.,M.(2005).Creatinginteractive multimedia-based educational courseware: cognition in learning. Cognition, Technology& Work, 7(1), 46-50. Doi:10.1007/s10111-004-0171-1.
  5. Macpherson, A., Elliot, M., Harris, I., & Homan, G. (2004). E-learning: reflections and evaluation of corporate programmes. Human Resource Development International, 7(3), 295-313.
  6. Pan, C., Sivo, S., Gunter, G., & Cornell, R. (2005). Students' Perceived Ease of Use of an eLearning Management System: An Exogenous or Endogenous Variable?. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 285-307. Retrieved from ERIC database.
  7. Simon, L., & Pauchant, T. (2000). Developing the Three Levels of Learning in Crisis Management: A Case Study of the Hagersville Tire Fire. Review of Business, 21(3/4), 6. Retrieved from Business Source Elite database.
  8. Watson, W., & Watson, S. (2007). An Argument for Clarity: What are Learning Management Systems, What are They Not, and What Should They Become?. TechTrends: Linking Research& Practice to Improve Learning, 51(2), 28-34. Doi:10.1007/s11528-007-0023-Y.-102DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.