You are here:

Development Methods for a Social Conversational Agent in a Virtual Learning Environment with an Educational Math Game PROCEEDINGS

, Linköping University, Sweden

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Toronto, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-81-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

We are developing a virtual learning environment, which includes a math game with a teachable agent, the embodiment of the agent, and a social conversation with the agent. In this work we are using various methods for design and system development, with a focus on iterative methods, and high involvement of the user in the process. In this paper we discuss the motivation for and the applications of these methods in the development of the social conversation with the agent.

Citation

Silvervarg, A. (2010). Development Methods for a Social Conversational Agent in a Virtual Learning Environment with an Educational Math Game. In J. Herrington & C. Montgomerie (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2010--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1218-1223). Toronto, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 16, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bickmore, T & Cassell, J. (1999) Small Talk and Conversational Storytelling In Embodied Interface Agents, In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence.
  2. Cooper, B., Brna, P. & Martins, A. (2000) Effective Affective in Intelligent Systems-Building on Evidence of Empathy in Teaching and Learning. In A.M. Paiva (Ed) Affective Interactions, LNAI 1814, pp. 21-34
  3. Danielsson, K. & Wiberg, C. (2006) Participatory Design of learning media: designing educational computer games with and for teenagers, in ITSE special issue: Computer Game-based Learning, Vol. 3, Issue 4, P.275-291, November 2006.
  4. Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., & Yerasimou, T. (2008). Conversational Agents and their Longitudinal Affordances on Communication and Interaction. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 251-270
  5. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann, W.B., Jr. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
  6. Gulz, A. (2004). Benefits of virtual characters in computer based learning environments: claims and evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 313-334.
  7. Gulz, A. & Haake, M. (2006). Design of animated pedagogical agents– Computer Studies, 64(4), 281-394.
  8. Nesset, V. & Large, A. (2004). Children in the information technology design process: A review of theories and their applications. Library and Information Science Research. 26(2): 140-161.
  9. Pareto, L. (2004). The Squares Family: A Game and Story based Microworld for Understanding Arithmetic Concepts designed to attract girls. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Vol. 2004, Issue 1, 2004, pp. 1567-1574.
  10. Scaife, M. And Rogers, Y. (1998) Kids as informants: telling us what we didn't know or confirming what we knew already? In A.
  11. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
  12. Veletsianos, G. (2007). Cognitive and Affective Benefits of an Animated Pedagogical Agent: Considering Contextual Relevance and Aesthetics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 373-377
  13. Veletsianos, G., & Miller, C. (2008). Conversing with Pedagogical Agents: A Phenomenological Exploration of Interacting with Digital Entities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 969-9 Acknowledgements

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.