You are here:

Challenging Teachers’ Preconceptions, Misconceptions, and Concerns of Virtual Schooling
PROCEEDINGS

, , Wayne State University, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Charleston, SC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-67-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of graduate students in an instructional technology course related to K-12 online learning based upon their completion of the Teacher Education Goes into Virtual Schooling (TEGIVS) curriculum. The TEGIVS program was created through a grant funded initiative at Iowa State University. Nine graduate students at a large, state-funded, mid-Western university completed this curriculum as a part of their Internet in the Classroom course. Based upon our initial analysis, the TEGIVS curriculum was effective for providing these graduate students with some experience with how K-12 online learning opportunities are delivered, along with some of the possibilities and challenges associated with these opportunities. The analysis of this data is continuing, and there are plans to continue this line of inquiry with additional students in future offerings of this course.

Citation

Barbour, M. & Unger, K. (2009). Challenging Teachers’ Preconceptions, Misconceptions, and Concerns of Virtual Schooling. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 785-790). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 25, 2022 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M.K., & Clark, T. (2008, March). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  2. Clark, T. (2001). Virtual schools: Trends and issues-A study of virtual schools in the United States. San Francisco, CA: Western Regional Educational Laboratories. Retrieved July 4, 2005 from http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/virtualschools.pdf
  3. Compton, L., Follett, J., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). Challenging Preservice Teachers' Preconceptions, Misconceptions, and Concerns of Virtual Schooling: A Preliminary Analysis. In Carlsen, R., McFerrin. K.,
  4. Davis, N, Niederhauser, D., Compton, L, Lindstrom, D., & Schoeny, Z. (2005). Virtual schooling lab practice: Case
  5. Davis, N., Demiraslan, Y., & Wortmann, K. (2007, October). Preparing to support online learning in K-12. A presentation at the Iowa Educational Technology conference, Des Moines, IA. Retrieved on August 11, 2008 from http://ctlt.iastate.edu/~tegivs/TEGIVS/publications/ITEC2007-presentations.pdf
  6. Davis, N., & Rose, R. (2007). Research committee issues brief: Professional development for virtual schooling and online learning. Vienna, VA: North American Council for Online Learning. Retrieved on August 11, 2008 from http://www.nacol.org/docs/NACOL_PDforVSandOlnLrng.pdf
  7. DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R.E., Black, E.W. & Preston, M. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1). Retrieved on August 11, 2008 from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/getfile.cfm?volID=7 & IssueID=22 & ArticleID=113
  8. Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London: Routledge.
  9. Kearsley, G., & Blomeyer, R. (2004), Preparing K-12 teachers to teach online. Educational Technology, 44(1), pp. 49-52. Retrieved on August 11, 2008 from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/TeachingOnline.htm
  10. LeCompte, M.D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed. Ed.).
  11. Nippard, E., & Murphy, E. (2007). Social presence in the web-based synchronous secondary classroom. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 33(1). Retrieved on August 11, 2008 from http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol33.1/nippard.html
  12. Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new view of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-13.
  13. Roblyer, M.D. (2003). Virtual high schools in the United States: Current views, future visions. In J. Bradley (Ed.), The open classroom: Distance learning in and out of schools (pp. 159– 170). London: Kogan Page.
  14. Roblyer, M.D., Freeman, J., Stabler, M., & Schneidmiller, J. (2007). External evaluation of the Alabama ACCESS initiative: Phase 3 report. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education. Retrieved on January 21, 2009 from http://accessdl.state.al.us/2006Evaluation.pdf
  15. Ruona, W.E.A. (2005). Analyzing qualitative data. In R.A. Swanson& E.F. Holdton III (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 233-263). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler
  16. Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, R. (2005). A synthesis on new research on K-12 online learning. Retrieved October 22, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/synthesis/synthesis.pdf
  17. Watt, D. (2005). Community-based learning opportunities for aboriginals, winner, 2005: The Sunchild E-Learning Community model. Ottawa, ON: Conference Board of Canada. Retrieved on January 21, 2009 from http://sso.conferenceboard.ca/documents.aspx?DID=1457
  18. Zucker, A., & Kozma, R. (2003). The virtual high school: Teaching generation V. New York: Teachers College Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections