You are here:

Teaching as a visible activity in remote networked schools: A socio-cultural perspective
PROCEEDINGS

, Laval University, Canada ; , Mc Gill University, Canada ; , University of Quebec in Chicoutimi, Canada

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Quebec City, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-63-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper addresses socio-cultural possibilities and obligations related to teaching as visible when teachers engage K-12 learners in the use of collaborative technologies over large bandwidth in small remote rural schools. A systemic initiative was conducted with the aim of enhancing the learning environment in such schools and keeping them from closing for pedagogical reasons. Engeström's activity theory framework provided the analytical framework. Leading teachers were teachers willing to open up their classrooms, using webcams and electronic forums, to a network of professional collaborators. We present the ways in which they did, and our understanding of the new possibilities and obligations that emerged.

Citation

Laferriere, T., Breuleux, A. & Allaire, S. (2007). Teaching as a visible activity in remote networked schools: A socio-cultural perspective. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2007--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 6846-6852). Quebec City, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 13, 2019 from .

© 2007 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Allaire, S., Beaudoin, J., Breuleux, A., Hamel, C., Inchauspé, P., Laferrière, T., & Turcotte, S. (2006). L'école éloignée en réseau. Rapport de recherche, phase II, CEFRIO, Québec.
  2. Barab, S., Kling, R., & Gray, J.H. (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
  4. Brown, A.L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist. 52 (4), 399-413.
  5. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon and T.O’ Shea (eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). New York: Springler-Verlag.
  6. Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E. Condliffe Lagemann, & Shulman, L.S., Issues in education research (pp. 289-198). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  7. Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  8. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer Press.
  9. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
  10. Hollan, J., & Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (2), 174-196.
  11. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  12. Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., & Inchauspé, P. (2004). L'école éloignée en réseau. Rapport de recherche, phase I, CEFRIO, Québec.
  13. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221-227.
  15. Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record 98(1), 7-45.
  16. Orr, J. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of modern job. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press.
  17. Riel, M., & Becker, H. (2000, April). The beliefs, practices, and computer use of teacher leaders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  18. Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994) Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 3, 265-283.
  20. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  21. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  22. Theureau, J. (2004). L’ hypothèse de la cognition (ou action) située et la tradition d ’ analyse du travail de l ’ ergonomie de langue fran ç aise, @ctivités, 1 (2), 11-25. Available: http://www.activites.org/v1n2/theureau.pdf [Retrieved

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References