A Case Study of Design-Based Research for Creating a Vision Prototype of a Technology-Based Innovative Learning Environment Article
Yuxin Ma, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, United States ; Stephen W. Harmon, Georgia State University, United States
Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 20, Number 1, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Design-based research is a burgeoning research paradigm holding the promise of introducing more socially responsible studies to transform education. However, there is a lack of methodological standards and established research processes to inform this type of study. Although there are general principles and procedures on design-based research, little guidance is available to researchers with regard to how to conduct design-based research at the individual iteration level when creating technology-based innovative learning environments. In this article, we describe a case study of design-based research in a single iteration, illustrate a research and development process evolved from this study, and present several guidelines on how to conduct design-based research.
Ma, Y. & Harmon, S.W. (2009). A Case Study of Design-Based Research for Creating a Vision Prototype of a Technology-Based Innovative Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(1), 75-93. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/25226/.
© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
- Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
- Carnevale, D. (2000, Feburary 21). Indiana University scholar says distance education requires new approach to teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education, P. A44.
- Chandler, T. N. (1994). The science education advisor: Applying a user centered design approach to the development of an interactive case-based advising system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(3), 283-318.
- Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6-11, 38-46.
- Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
- Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (2002). Instructional technology in higher education. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 256-268). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
- Dede, C. (2004). If design-based research is the answer, what is the question? A commentary on Collins, Joseph, and Bielaczyc; diSessa and Cobb; and Fishman, Marx, Blumenthal, Krajcik, and Soloway in the JLS special Issue on design-based research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 105-114.
- Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
- Erickson, T. (1995). Notes on design practice: Stories and prototypes as catalysts for communication. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development (pp. 37-58). New York: Wiley.
- Fletcher, J. J., & Patrick, S. K. (1998). Not just workshops any more: The role of faculty development in reframing academic priorities. International Journal for Academic Development, 3(1), 39-47.
- Gagne, R. M. (1985). The condition of learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Hagner, P. R. (2000). Faculty engagement and support in the new learning environment. Educause Review, 35(5), 37-37.
- Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Frustrations with a Web-based distance education course: A taboo topic in the discourse. Retrieved July 3, 2004, from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/wp99_01.html
- Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
- Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N., & Guzdial, M. (2003). Case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 829-861). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Krueger, K., Boboc, M., & Cornish, Y. (2003). InTime: Online video resources for teacher educators featuring technology integration in preK-12 classrooms. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 28, 183-197.
- Laga, E., & Elen, J. (2001). Characteristics of support initiatives to stimulate professional evelopment on ICT. In B. Gillan & K. McFerrin (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (pp. 692-697). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
- LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Analyzing & Interpreting ethnographic data. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
- Leone, P., Gillihan, D., & Rauch, T. (2000). Web-based prototyping for user sessions: Mediumfidelity prototyping. Paper presented at the Society for Technical Communications 44th Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada. Ludolph, F.
- Mayhew, D. J. (1999). The usability engineering lifecycle: A practitioner's handbook for user interface design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
- Meacham, J. (2002). Our doctoral programs are failing our undergraduate students. Liberal Education, 88(3), 22-27.
- Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and the case method in teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 722-744). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Murray, J. P.
- NEA Higher Education Research Center. (2002). The promise and the reality of distance education. NEA Higher Education Research Center Update, 8(3).
- O'Donnell, A. M. (2004). A commentary on design research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 255-260.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69-77.
- Reeves, T. C. (1995). Questioning the questions of instructional technology research. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), Anaheim, CA.
- Reeves, T. C. (2000). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other development research strategies. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53–65. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 5-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Richey, R. C. (1998). The pursuit of useable knowledge in instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 7-22.
- Russell, T. L. (2003). The no significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved July 5, 2004, from http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/
- Schmertzing, R., & Schmertzing, L. (2001). Student expectations of distance education: Instructor roles in an interactive television classroom. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 2001(1), 739-745.
- Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25-28.
- Thomas, J. R. (1997). Vision and leadership for selecting and mentoring new faculty in higher education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(5), 41-46.
- Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
- Wang, F., Moore, J. L., Wedman, J., & Shyu, C. (2003). Developing a case-based reasoning knowledge repository to support a learning community - An example from the technology integration community. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 45-62. Weinschenk, S., Jamar, P., & Yeo, S. C. (1997). GUI design essentials. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.