
The Role of Interaction in Enhancing Achievement and Student Satisfaction in an Online Course: A Rubric Analysis
PROCEEDINGS
Belle Alderman, University of Canberra, Australia
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-57-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA
Abstract
Abstract: Interaction is highly prized in online and distance education courses. Essential qualities of interaction have been widely discussed in the literature and parts of some courses evaluated against these specific qualities. This paper examines a course that was designed and implemented using constructivist learning principles with a high level of collaborative interaction. At the end of this course students were evaluated to determine their perceptions of achievement and satisfaction. A rubric devised by Roblyer and Wiencke (2003) was applied to benchmark types and levels of interaction. The conclusion reached is that while high level, quality interaction was an essential contributor to these students' achievement and satisfaction, some aspects of instructional design require modification to further enhance achievement and satisfaction.
Citation
Alderman, B. (2005). The Role of Interaction in Enhancing Achievement and Student Satisfaction in an Online Course: A Rubric Analysis. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2005--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 214-219). Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 2, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/21171/.
© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in web-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 3-29.
- Hirumi, A. (2002). The design and sequencing of e-Learning interactions: A grounded approach, International Journal on eLearning 1(1), 19-27.
- Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J. & Haag, B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education, The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26.
- Moore, M.G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
- Price, R. (1991). Finding the form. In B. Alderman& P. Clayton (Eds.), Creative connections: Writing, Illustrating And Publishing Children’s Books in Australia. Port Melbourne, Vic: D.W. Thorpe.
- Roblyer, M.D., & Wiencke, W.R. (2004). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses, American Journal of Distance Education. 17(2), 77-98.
- Sims. R. (2003). Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning, Distance Education, 24(1), 88-103.
- Sims, R. (1999). The Interactive Conundrum I: Interactive Constructs and Learning Theory. In J. Winn (Ed), Responding to Diversity. Proceedings of 16 th Annual Conference of ASCILITE. Brisbane: QUT, Teaching and Learning Support Services. Retrieved 7 July 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane99/papers/sims.pdf
- Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. London: Kogan Page.
- Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction, Education, Communication& Information, 2(1), 23-49.
- Tu, C.H. & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes, The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
- Wagner, E.D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 91, 19-26.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References