You are here:

The SimSchool Project: Using Classroom Management Simulations to help Future Teachers Teach and Improve Student Learning!
PROCEEDINGS

, The SimSchool Project, United States ; , The Vermont Institutes, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Phoenix, AZ, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-55-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The SimSchool Project is creating a computer simulation where teachers can virtually go to practice their teaching and classroom management skills within a fun, realistic and safe educational simulation - game environment. This simulation will also document growth and user teachers' results-oriented abilities by using a powerful new data tracking and reporting tool; simtrack. This session will share how the project is (1) Developing simulated K12 classrooms of students. (2) Implementing case-based simulations that increase preservice students' skills in results-driven classroom practices. (3) Documenting the impact on teacher educators' and future teachers' effectiveness in achieving student results. (4) Disseminating the findings. As a result of activities supporting these goals, simSchool hopes to impact preservice curricula, enhance preservice teaching, increase the percentage of new teachers who possess knowledge and skills in results-driven classroom practices and gather baseline and change-over-time data on the status of student results.

Citation

Halverson, B. & Gibson, D. (2005). The SimSchool Project: Using Classroom Management Simulations to help Future Teachers Teach and Improve Student Learning!. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2005--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2624-2628). Phoenix, AZ, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bransford, J., Brown, A., Cocking, R. (eds) (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington: DC. National Academy Press.
  2. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Alexandria: VA. Association for Supervision& Curriculum Development.
  3. Dexter, S. (2003). The Promise of Network-Based Assessment for Supporting the Development of Teachers’ Technology Integration and Implementation Skills Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education conference in Alberqueque, NM 2003. Available: http://www.education.umn.edu/edutech/!lead/ResearchResources/eTIP_Cases/SITE03_networkAssess.htm
  4. Friedrichs A. & Gibson, D. (2002). Personalization and Secondary School Renewal. In Personal Learning: Preparing High School Students to Create Their Future. Dimartino J. And Clarke, J. (Eds.). Scarecrow Press.
  5. ISTE. (2003). International society for technology in education standards for students, teachers and administrators. Available: http://www.iste.org.
  6. Lemke, C. (2003) Bridging the Achievement Gap through 21st Century Skills: Practical Research-based Learning Solutions that Work. Available: http://www.starnet.org/prof_dev/prog_info/lemke_c.htmlMeans,B.(2003)TechnologyandConstructivistLearning.Available:http://www.ncrel.org/cscd/pubs/lead51/51means.htm
  7. McLaughlin, B. (2002) Digital Equity: Training Future Teachers to Bridge the Divide Available: http://www.pt3.org/stories/equity.html
  8. Millman, J. (Ed.) (1997). Grading teachers, grading schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  9. Millman, J. (1981). Student achievement as a measure of teaching competence. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, P. 146-166.
  10. NCTAF. (2003) No Dream Denied. National Council on Teaching and America's Future. Available: http://www.nctaf.org/dream/dream.html
  11. NRC. (2002) Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. National Research Council. Available: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309074398/html/ NSDC. (2003). National Staff Development Council portal on standards-based professional development. Available: http://www.edreform.net.
  12. OSEP. (2003) IDEA website. Available: http://www.ideada Ta.o rg/index.html Peterman, F. (in press). Prepress manuscript for a chapter on urban schools, prepared as part of the UNITE workgroups. Personal files.
  13. Segren, A. (2003). Simulations, scenarios and multimedia for enhanced student engagement. Proceedings of the International Conference on Higher Education Innovation, Iowa State University of the United States and Nizhyn State Pedagogical University of Urkraine. May 14, 2003. Teachers' House. Kiev, Ukraine.
  14. Schmoker, M. (2003) The Results Fieldbook. Reston: VA. ASCD.
  15. Shulman, L. (1990). Paradigms and Programs (Research in Teaching and Learning, Vol 1). New York:NY. MacMillan.
  16. SITE. (2003). Society for information technology in teacher education proceedings of conferences from 2001 to 2003. Available: http://www.site.org.
  17. Stiggins, R. (2003) Assessment Training Institute. Available: http://www.assessmentinst.com/ Stufflebeam, D. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. Madaus, M. Scriven, and D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services in Evaluation, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, P. 117-141.
  18. Sun, J. & Schneider, R. (2003). Is wireless worth it? Technology and Learning, May, Vol 23, Num 10. Pgs 24-30.
  19. Wiggins, G. (2003) Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance. San Francisco: CA. Jossey Bass.
  20. Willis, J. (2000). Defining a Field: Content, Theory, and Research Issues. Contemporary Issues in Technology& Teacher Education, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, pp. 209-219

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.