
Is Teaching of Technology Courses Online as Effective as Teaching of Technology Courses Face-to-Face?
PROCEEDINGS
Chia-Ling Kuo, Hongbo Song, Renee Smith, Ohio University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Phoenix, AZ, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-55-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
This study examined and compared college students' attitudes toward technology and technological application skills in a technology applications course that has two different delivery modes: online and face-to-face. A three-part survey was designed and administered to those two groups of about thirty undergraduate students each who major in education at a Midwestern university in the United States. Descriptive statistics was used to understand the background information. An independent t test was used to analyze the differences before and after taking the technology course in each of the online and face-to-face classes. An independent t test was also analyzed to look at the comparison of the online course and the face-to-face course. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the online and face-to-face classes in students' attitudes toward technology before and after taking a technology application course. The technological application skills were increased after the course and presented significant after vs. before differences in both teaching formats.
Citation
Kuo, C.L., Song, H. & Smith, R. (2005). Is Teaching of Technology Courses Online as Effective as Teaching of Technology Courses Face-to-Face?. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2005--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 923-927). Phoenix, AZ, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 7, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/19135/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Caywood, K., & Ducket, J. (2003). Online vs. On-campus learning in teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26 (2), 98-105.
- Ladyshewsky, R.K. (2004). E-learning compared with face to face: Differences in the academic achievement of postgraduate business students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20 (3), 316-336.
- Nicol, D.J., Minty, I., & Sinclair, C. (2003). The social dimensions of online learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40 (3), 270-80.
- Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999, April). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved December 6, 2004, from http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Difference.pdf Prince, D., & Stern, P. (2002, January). Online learning students: Characteristics, satisfaction, and implications for future planning. A summary of findings from two system development projects. Olympia, WA: Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. ERIC No. ED 481385.
- Sellers, R.G., Wright, K.E., Wright, V.H. (2003). Attitudes and perceptions of on-and off-campus students of an internet-based graduate allied health program. ERIC No. ED478777
- Van Schaik, P., Barker, P., & Beckstrand, S. (2003). A comparison of on-campus and online course delivery methods in Southern Nevada, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40 (1), 5-15.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References