What motivate learners to keep attending a MOOC and take a new one: a research model proposal
Leonardo Caporarello, Bocconi University, and SDA Bocconi School of Management, Italy ; Federica Cirulli, Paolo Bonaiuti, Bocconi University, BUILT Bocconi University Innovations in Learning and Teaching, Italy
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-35-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA
A Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology study reported the 2016 as the year with the minimum number of learners who attended a MOOC. In more recent studies, the number of MOOC-participants who finished a MOOC after enrolment has been observed to be very low with dropout rates between 98 and 90% (Henderikx, Kreijns, & Kalz, 2017). Since high dropout rates are observed, it is relevant to understand what learners expect attending a MOOC. Understanding learners’ motivators for attending MOOCs is essential since it is one of the strongest predictor of MOOCs’ completion (Barba et al., 2016, Xiong et al., 2015). This study analyses what are the main motivators to keep attending a MOOC, the variation in the motivation during the MOOC attending and the relation between motivation and the willingness of enrolment in a new MOOC after attendance in a previous one. An adapted version of IMMS (Instructional Materials Motivation Survey) has been selected to conduct a quantitative analysis of learners’ motivators (Keller, 2010; Huang & Hew, 2016). The result showed that most participants’ motivators medians were positive.
Caporarello, L., Cirulli, F. & Bonaiuti, P. (2018). What motivate learners to keep attending a MOOC and take a new one: a research model proposal. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1449-1461). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/185114/.
© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Aduayi-Akue, J., Lotchi, K., Parveen, S., Onatsu, T. & Pehkonen-Elmi, T. (2017). Motivation of Online Learners. Retrieved May, 24, 2018, from https://verkkolehdet.jamk.fi/ev-peda/2017/01/25/motivation-of-online-learners/
- Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Delgado-Kloos, C., Crespo-García, R.M., Villena-Román, J. & Ruiz-Magaña, J. (2017). Integration of External Tools to Foster Learner Interaction in MOOCs: The Example of Codeboard. Proceedings of the International Conference MOOC-Maker 2017, MOOC-Maker 2017 (1-10). Antigua, Guatemala.
- Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C. & Fernández-Panadero C. (2017). Understanding Learners' Motivation and Learning Strategies in MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). Retrieved April, 10, 2018, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2996/4172
- Andres, J.M.L., Baker, R.S., Siemens, G., Spann, C.A., Gasevic, D. & Crossley, S. (2017). Studying MOOC Completion at Scale Using the MOOC Replication Framework. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 338-339).
- Baker, R., Evans, B., Greenberg, G. & Dee, T. (2014). Understanding persistence in MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses): Descriptive and Experimental Evidence. In Proceedings of the European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit (pp. 5-11).
- Bakki, A, Oubahssi, L., Cherkaoui, C. & George, S. (2015). Motivation and Engagement in MOOCs: How to Increase Learning Motivation by Adapting Pedagogical Scenarios? In Proceedings of EC-TEL Tolède, Spain.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
- Barba, D., Kennedy, D. & Ainley, M.D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, (pp. 218–231).
- Bohlin, R.M., Milheim, W.D. & Viechnicki, K.J. (1990). A model for the motivational instruction of adults. In Proceedings of selected paper presentations at ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED323918. Retrieved 21, May, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED323918.pdf
- Borras-Gene, O., Martínez Núñez, M., & Fidalgo-Blanco, A. (2016). New Challenges for the Motivation and Learning in Engineering Education Using Gamification in MOOC. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 1(B), (pp.501–512).
- Chen, G, Davis, D., Lin, J., Hauff, C. & Houben, GJ. (2016). Beyond the MOOC platform: gaining insights about learners from the social web. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science (pp.15-25), Hannover,
- Cook, D.A., Beckman, T.J., Thomas, K.G. & Thompson, W.G. (2009). Measuring motivational characteristics of courses: Applying Keller's instructional materials motivation survey to a web-based course. Academic Medicine, 84(11), (pp.1505-1509).
- De Freitas, S.I., Morgan, J. & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 455–471. Retrieved April, 4, 2018, from10.1111/bjet.12268
- Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, (pp.319–338).
- Elgort, I., Lundqvist, K., McDonald, J. & Moskal, A.C.M. (2018). Analysis of student discussion posts in a MOOC: Proof of concept. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK18), Sydney, Australia.
- Elliot, A.J. & Thrash, T.M. (2002). Approach–avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818. Retrieved May, 11, 2018, from10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2064
- Evans, D. (2012). Introduction to computer science. Udacity. Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(6), B11.
- Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5), (pp.1–26).
- Glynn, S.M. & Koballa, T.R. (2006). Motivation to learn in college science. In J.J. Mintzes & W.H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25–32). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
- Guay, F., Vallerand, R.J. & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, (pp.175–213).
- Hakami, N., White, S. & Chakaveh, S. (2017). Motivational Factors that Influence the use of MOOCs: Learners’ Perspectives. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2017), (pp. 323-331), Porto, Portugal.
- Henderikx, M.A., Kreijns, K. & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), (pp.353-368). Retrieved March, 20, 2018, from
- Hood, N., Littlejohn, A. & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners' contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, (pp.83-91).
- Huang, B. & Hew K. (2016). Measuring Learners’ Motivation Level in Massive Open Online Courses. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(10). Retrieved May, 10, 2018, from http://www.ijiet.org/vol6/788-A001.pdf
- Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, (pp.48-73). Retrieved May, 15, 2018, from
- Huett, J. (2006). The Effects of ARCS-Based Confidence Strategies on Learner Confidence and Performance in Distance Education. Dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton (Texas).
- Hulleman, C.S. & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, (pp.1410–1412).
- Hytti, U., Stenholm, P., Heinonen, J. & Seikkula-Leino, J. (2010). Perceived learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education: the impact of student motivation and team behaviour. Education+Training, 52, (pp.587-606).
- Keller, J.M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26-34. Retrieved April, 20, 2018, from
- Keller, J.M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K.E. Shaw (Eds.), Aspects of educational technology. Vol. XVII: Staff development and career updating. London: Kogan Page.
- Keller, J.M. (1987). Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations, Journal of Consumer Research, 14, (pp.316-33).
- Keller, J.M. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. Paper presented at VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba.
- Keller J.M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: the ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved June, 15, 2018, from https://www.learning-theories.com/kellers-arcs-model-ofmotivational-design.html
- Keller, J.M. (2010). Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer.
- Kizilcec, R.F. & Halawa, S. (2015). Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning@Scale (pp. 57–66), Vancouver, Canada.
- Lazowski, R.A. & Hulleman, C.S. (2015). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, XX(X), (pp.1-39).
- Lee, M.K., Cheung, C.M. & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), (pp.1095-1104).
- Li, Z., He, M. & Liu, Y. (2017). Research on Influence Factor and Optimization Development of Learning Motivation based on MOOC Education. Boletín Técnico, 55, 10. Retrieved May, 3, 2018, from http://boletintecnico.com/index.php/bt/article/view/922
- Liao, H. & Wang, Y. (2008). Applying the ARCS motivation model in technological and vocational education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 1(2), (pp.53-58).
- Loorbach, N., Peters, O., Karreman, J. & Steehouder, M. (2014). Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), (pp.204-218).
- Mahle, M. (2011). Effects of interactivity on student achievement and motivation in distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), (pp.207-215).
- Mayo, R.J. (1977). The development and construct validation of a measure of intrinsic motivation. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univer., 1976) Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 5417B.
- McAuley, E., Duncan, T. & Tammen, V.V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly of Exercise and Sport, 60, (pp.48–
- 58).Mega, C., Ronconi, L. & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational psychology, 106, (pp.121-131).
- Milligam, C. & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why Study on a MOOC? The Motives of Students and Professionals. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2). Retrieved June 2, 2018, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3033/4086
- Mori, K. & Ractliffe, L. (2016). Evaluating the use of a MOOC within higher Education professional development training. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 831-833).
- Papaioannou, A.G. (2017). Teaching a holistic, harmonious and internal motivational concept of excellence to promote Olympic ideals, health and well-being for all. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36, 353-368.
- Park, J.H. & Choi, H.J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners' decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), (pp.207-217). Retrieved March, 13, 2018, from
- Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.149–172). Boston, MA: Springer.
- Wuang, Y. & Baker, R. (2015). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1). Retrieved May, 2, 2018, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol11no1/Wang_0315.pdf
- Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M.L., Suen, H.K., Pursel, B. & Goins, D.D. (2015). Examining the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2(3), (pp.23-33).
- Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Schroeder, U. & Wosnitza, M. (2014). What Drives a Successful MOOC? An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOCs. Proceeding of Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference (pp. 44-48).
- Zimmerman, B.J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Eds.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–230). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
- Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), (pp.82–91).
- Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic achievement: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, (pp. 663-676).
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.