You are here:

Design Thinking in Teacher Education: Preparing Engineering Students for Teaching at Vocational Schools
PROCEEDING

, Fachhochschule Münster, Germany ; , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-35-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

The paper discusses design thinking as a conceptual framework and methodological approach for empowering the teaching agency of STEM students who are preparing for a career as vocational school teachers. Our pilot study, a workshop on curriculum development, lesson planning and instructional techniques with engineering students, reflects the specific traits and current challenges of vocational education in the German dual mode system. We analyze and reflect upon the conceptual development, facilitation and evaluation of the workshop. We give a detailed overview of workshop concept, workshop results and workshop evaluation data. Practitioners and researchers alike will find this article a valuable source for contemplating the effectiveness of design thinking in teacher education. While our case study is situated in the particular context of preparing future vocational school teachers within the German education system, the resulting concepts are applicable to other populations. Design thinking can enrich teacher education by allowing students with little prior teaching experience and career changers to experience their agency as inventors in the classroom laboratory, thus creating both excitement and appreciation for the art of teaching.

Citation

Harth, T. & Panke, S. (2018). Design Thinking in Teacher Education: Preparing Engineering Students for Teaching at Vocational Schools. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 392-407). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 23, 2020 from .

© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.
  2. Bross, J., Acar, A.E., Schilf, P., & Meinel, C. (2009, August). Spurring Design Thinking through educational weblogging. In Computational Science and Engineering, 2009. CSE'09. International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 903-908). IEEE.
  3. Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
  4. Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43.
  5. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5-21.
  6. Cantoni, L., Marchiori, E., Faré, M., Botturi, L., & Bolchini, D. (2009, October). A systematic methodology to use lego bricks in web communication design. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication (pp. 187192).
  7. Cochrane, T. & Munn, J. (2016). EDR and Design Thinking: Enabling Creative Pedagogies. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 315-324). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the
  8. Deissinger, T., & Hellwig, S. (2005). Apprenticeships in Germany: modernising the dual system. Education+ Training, 47(4/5), 312-324.
  9. Dohmen, D. (2018). Prognose der Schüler*innenzahl und des Lehrkräftebedarfs an berufsbildenden Schulen bis 2030. FiBS Forschungsinstitut für Bildungs-und Sozialökonomie, GEW. Https://www.gew.de/fileadmin/media/publikationen/hv/Berufliche_Bildung/20180309_BedarfanalyseSchueler_innenzahl_web.pdf
  10. Elsbach, K.D., & Stigliani, I. (2018). Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research. Journal of Management, 0149206317744252.
  11. Goldschmidt, G. (2017). Design Thinking: A Method or a Gateway into Design Cognition?. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(2), 107-112.
  12. Hodgkinson, G. (2013). Teaching Design Thinking. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2013--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1520-1524). Victoria, Canada: Association for the
  13. Hunt, V., Prince S., Dixon-Fyle, D. & Yee, L. (2018). Delivering Through Diversity. McKinsey & Company Report. Retrieved April 3, 2018 from https://www.efm-berlinale.de/media/pdf_word/efm/68_efm/microsites/horizon/diversity-report.pdf
  14. Kansanen, P. (2009). Subject-matter didactics as a central knowledge base for teachers, or should it be called pedagogical content knowledge? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(1), 29–39.
  15. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2012). Activity theory in HCI: Fundamentals and Reflections. Synthesis Lectures Human-Centered Informatics, 5(1), 1-105.
  16. Lamb, R., & Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 197-236.
  17. Lehr D. (2011). Belastung und Beanspruchung im Lehrerberuf: Gesundheitliche Situation und Evidenz für Risikofaktoren. In: Terhart E, Bennewitz H & Rothland M. (Hrsg): Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf. Münster: Waxmann, 757–773.
  18. Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925-938.
  19. Lindberg, T., Meinel, C., & Wagner, R. (2011). Design thinking: A fruitful concept for it development?. In Design Thinking (pp. 3-18). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  20. Matthews, J.H., & Wrigley, C. (2017). Design and design thinking in business and management higher education. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 41-54.
  21. Melles, G., Howard, Z., & Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2012). Teaching design thinking: Expanding horizons in design education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 162-166.
  22. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines (pp. 412-424). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
  23. Meyer, J.H., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher education, 49(3), 373-388.
  24. Oygür, I. (2018). The machineries of user knowledge production. Design Studies, 54, 23-49
  25. Panke, S., Gaiser, B., & Werner, B. (2007). Evaluation as Impetus for Innovations in E-learning—Applying personas to the design of community functions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 179-190.
  26. Panke, S. & Harth, T. (2018). Design Thinking for Inclusive Community Design: (How) Does it Work?. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, … O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 284-296). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  27. Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003, June). Personas: practice and theory. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences (pp. 1-15). ACM.
  28. Rittel, H.W., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
  29. Sanders, E.B.N., & Stappers, P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18.
  30. Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3).
  31. Skaggs, P. (2018). Design Thinking: Empathy through Observation, Experience, and Inquiry. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1168-1172).
  32. Straush, A. (2018). Https://www.sueddeutsche.de/karriere/arbeitsmarkt-deutschland-gehen-die-berufsschullehrer-aus-1.3887763
  33. Von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design thinking in higher education: How students become dedicated creative problem solvers. In Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 306–328). IGI
  34. Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374-385.
  35. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections