You are here:

Preservice Teachers’ Uses of SMILE to Enact Student-Generated Questioning Practices PROCEEDINGS

, New York Institute of Technology, United States ; , Stanford University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Kona, Hawaii, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

SMILE (Stanford Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning Environment) is a technology developed to support student learning through student-generated questioning. Literature has shown that student-generated questions can positively affect students’ learning motivation and reading comprehension, depending on teachers’ design of learning activities. To explore ways that teachers may use SMILE to support student-generated questioning practices, we piloted it with 26 preservice teachers. They used SMILE to enact student-generated questioning practices that elicit and use higher-order thinking in the learning process. We evaluated questions generated by teachers and reported their implementation experience with K-12 students. Our paper discusses teachers and students’ sense of achievement with student-generated questioning practices, perceived satisfaction, and challenges of using SMILE to enhance student-generated questioning practices in the classroom.

Citation

Hsu, H.Y. & Kim, P. (2015). Preservice Teachers’ Uses of SMILE to Enact Student-Generated Questioning Practices. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 348-356). Kona, Hawaii, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 16, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ahn, R., & Class, M. (2011). Student-Centered Pedagogy: Co-Construction of Knowledge through Student-Generated Midterm Exams. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 269–281.
  2. Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
  3. Buckner, E., & Kim, P. (2013). Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE). Prospects, 1–20.
  4. Chin, C. & Brown, D.E. (2002). Student generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–249.
  5. Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resources for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39.
  6. Cuccio-Schirripa, S. & Steiner, H.E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(2), 210-224.
  7. Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 256-62.
  8. Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., & Pearson, P.D. (1991). Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264. .& Emerson, H. (1987). Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60(3), 181-199.
  9. Kirschner, P.A., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching, 41(2), 75–86.
  10. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2006). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. Wong, B.Y.L. (1985). Self-Questioning Instructional Research: A Review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227–268.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.