You are here:

Distance Education Attrition
Article

, Gonzaga University, United States

IJET Volume 1, Number 4, ISSN 1077-9124 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

A need for research to determine predictors of attrition from distance education is of particular importance because governmental funding to institutions of higher education is often based on attendance. Attrition rates in distance education format have been reported as high as twice that of traditional instruction. One hundred and seventy community college students were the sample for this study. Each completed two instruments: The Rotter's Internal-External Locus of Control scale and a student information sheet. Discriminant analysis was then used to determine predictors of attrition. It was determined that locus of control and source of financial assistance, in particular self-pay, were able to predict dropout with nearly 85 percent accuracy. In addition to qualitative analysis, interviews with non-completers provided insight into personal and private reasons that students had for non-completion. It was determined that lack of time management skills and ill-defined educational goals were the primary reasons given by the students. These findings were consistent with other researchers in the field of distance education. The results of this study are important for practitioners in the area of distance education as student control and time management skills are essential for students working in distance education formats.

Citation

Parker, A. (1995). Distance Education Attrition. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 389-406. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 23, 2023 from .

© 1995 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Aberson, H. (1990). Distance Education in the U.S., The Reading Journal, 12(3), 18-22.
  2. Altmann, H., & Arambasich, L. (1982). A study of locus of control with adults tuden ts, Canadian Counselor, 16(2), 97-101. Astin , A. (1991). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Carr, R., & Ledwith, F. (1988). Helping disadvantaged students., Teaching Distance Education Attrition 405 Dille , B. , & Mezack , M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourses tuden ts , American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1) , 24-35. Ehrman , M. (1990). Psychological factors and distance education, American Journal of Distance Education, 4(1) , 10-23.
  4. Fields, L., & Lemay, J. (1989). Factors involved with successful freshman persistence a t the community college, Community College Research, 14(3), 31-39.
  5. Glass, G., & Hopkins, K.D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Iwai , S. , & Churchill, W. (1982). College attrition and the financial support systems of students, Research in Higher Education, 17(2) , 105-113.
  6. Kester, D. (1980, April). The diagnostic questionnaire was fast and rough, but i t was also good enough. Paper presented at the California Commun
  7. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211. Lefcourt , H. (1984). Research with the locus of control construct. Volume 1 : New York: Academic Press.
  8. Marsh, H., & Richards, G. (1987). The Rotter Locus of Control Scale: The comparison of alternative response formats and implications for reliability, validity and dimensional ly, Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 509-528.
  9. Miles, M. & Huberman, A. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis. New York, Sage Publications.
  10. Moore, M. (1989). Recruiting andre taining adults tuden ts in distance education, New Directions for Continuing Education, 47, 69-98.
  11. Nie, N., Hull, C., Jenkins, J., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D. (1975). Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Pavlov , I.P. (1960). Conditioned re f lexes: An investigation of the psychological activity of the cerebral cortex. New York: Dover Publication. Reed, D. , & Sork , T. (1990). Ethical considerations in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(2) , 30-43.
  12. Rotter, J. (1966). “Generalized expectations for internal versus external control of reinforcement,” Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
  13. Rotter, J. (1986). Internal versus external control of reinforcement. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489-493. Rotter , J. (1989). “Internal versus external control of reinforcement,” Amer-406 Parker
  14. Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Skinner, B.F. (1968). The technologies of teaching. New York: Apple tonCentury-Crofts.
  16. Steitz, J. (1985). Issues of adult development within the academic env iron DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections