You are here:

Multiple approaches to faculty development: How to play the game with the cards you’ve been dealt
PROCEEDINGS

, Nova Southeastern University, United States ; , , University of West Florida, United States ; , Nova Southeastern University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper considers three common approaches, or faculty development models, depending on teaching delivery (face-to-face, hybrid, and distance delivery). It also describes the support strategies that succeed with these models. The paper proposes faculty development occurs in a sequence from face-to-face support to distance delivery. The paper develops these models based on three variables: faculty expertise, the time-place dimension, and the Faculty/Designer ratio. Finally the article describes support strategies to meet the needs of varying Faculty/Designer scenarios.

Citation

Slapak-Barski, J., Lewis, D., Flum, L. & Spieler, R. (2014). Multiple approaches to faculty development: How to play the game with the cards you’ve been dealt. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 1843-1852). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 3, 2022 from .

© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Atkins, D.E., Brown J.S., & Hammond A.L. (2007). A review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation,1 (84). Https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf Atomic Learning (2014). Higher Education: Software Training, Support, and Course Technology Integration Tools-Atomic Learning. Retrieved from http://www.atomiclearning.com/highed
  2. Blackboard (2014). Blackboard Online Collaboration Tools| Online Collaboration Platform| Blackboard Collaborate. Retrieved from http://www.blackboard.com/Platforms/Collaborate/Overview.aspx Brooks, C.F. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty-first century: blending online communities of practice and face-to-face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3) 261-270. Doi:10.1080/14703297.2010.498177
  3. Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational technology research and development, 42(2), 21-29. Doi:10.1007/BF02299088.
  4. Coldeway, D.O. (1986). Learner characteristics and success. In I. Mugridge and D. Kaufman (eds.), Distance Education in Canada. London: Croom Helm.
  5. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2012). The Distant Crowd: Transactional Distance and New Social Media Literacies. International Journal of Learning, 4(3-4), 65-72. .
  6. El-Hussein, M.O.M., & Cronje, J.C. (2010). Defining Mobile Learning in the Higher Education Landscape. Educational Technology& Society, 13 (3), 12–21.
  7. Georgina, D.A., & Olson, M.R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty selfperceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 1-8. Doi:10.1016/J.iheduc.2007.11.002
  8. Google (2014). Google+ Hangouts. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/+/learnmore/hangouts/ Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (Eds). (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Routledge.
  9. Knowles, M.S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species. (4th ed). Houston: Gulf.
  10. Lewis, D. (2005, October). Demobank: a method of presenting just-in-time online learning. In Simonson, Michael& Crawford, Margaret, (Eds.) The Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) Annual International Convention (Vol 2, P. 371-375). Orlando, FL, USA.
  11. Lewis, D. & Slapak-Barski, J. (2014). The Faculty Toolbox: A tool for promoting faculty use of Instructional Technologies. In M. Searson& M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (pp. 785-787). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  12. Lewis, D, & Slapak-Barski, J. (2014). "I’m not sharing my work!” An approach to community building. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15 (2) 9-20.
  13. Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6. .
  14. Morrison, G., Ross, S., & Kemp, J. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  15. Nerantzi, C. (2013). OER? What OER? Integrating Video OER in a Teacher Education Programme. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, North America (1). Retrieved from http://jpaap.napier.ac.uk/index.php/JPAAP/article/view/68. Novak, J.D. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15(1) 77–101. .
  16. Orellana, A. (2006). Class size and interaction in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 229-248.
  17. Perkins, D.N. (1992). Transfer of Learning. International Encyclopedia of Education, Second Edition. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
  18. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education (5th Ed). Boston: Pearson Education.
  19. Skype (2014). Skype| Free calls to friends and family. Retrieved from http://www.skype.com/en/ Stevens, E., Dunlap, J., Bates, B., Lowenthal, P., Wray, M., & Switzer, T. (2005). Faculty development attitudes and motivators. In annual meeting of the Northern Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association, Jackson, WY.
  20. University of Central Florida (2014). Teaching Online Pedagogical Repository. Retrieved from https://topr.online.ucf.edu/index.php/Main_Page Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91.
  21. Wodzicki, K., Schwämmlein, E., & Moskaliuk, J. (2012). “Actually, I Wanted to Learn”: Study-related knowledge exchange on social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 9-14.
  22. Zoom (2014). Zoom: The Cloud meeting company. Retrieved from https://www.zoom.us/

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections