#
Using Online Applets to Improve Students’ Mathematical Reasoning
PROCEEDINGS

## Mustafa Demir, Rico Reaser, University of Detroit Mercy, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in New Orleans, LA, USA ISBN 978-1-939797-12-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

## Abstract

This study examined the effects of using Online Math Applets (OMAs) on middle school students’ solutions of the mathematical problems requiring different levels of mathematical reasoning. Through using the Smith and Stein (1998)’s framework for categorizing tasks, the problems are identified as memorization, procedures without connections, and procedures with connections. Participants were forty-two eight-grade students, randomly assigned into groups, studied quadratic equations and their graphs throughout the online-applets based versus traditional lecture. The pre-and posttest assessing students’ performance on the three types of questions mentioned above were administered. The findings indicated that students using OMAs considerably improved their solutions on the “procedures with connections” type of problems requiring higher-level of cognitive efforts.

## Citation

Demir, M. & Reaser, R. (2014). Using Online Applets to Improve Students’ Mathematical Reasoning. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 482-487). New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 28, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/148893/.

© 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

### Keywords

## References

View References & Citations Map- Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198.
- Crawford, C., & Brown, E. (2003). Integrating Internet-based mathematical manipulatives within a learning environment. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22(2), 169-180.
- Dreyfus, T., & Halevi, T. (1991). Quadfun—A case study of pupil computer interaction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 10(2), 43-58.
- Ellis, A.B., & Grinstead, P. (2008). Hidden lessons: How a focus on slope-like properties of quadratic functions encouraged unexpected generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(4), 277-296.
- Kaput, J.J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-556). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
- Kaput, J.J. (1998). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A kaleidoscope of windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265–281.
- Mendiburo, M., & Hasselbring, T. (2014). Technology's Impact on Fraction Learning: An experimental comparison of virtual and physical manipulatives. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(2), 209-231.
- Moon, K., Brenner, M.E., Jacob, B., & Okamoto, Y. (2013). Prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ understanding and cognitive difficulties in making connections among representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(3), 201-227.
- Moyer-Packenham, P.S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 4(3), 35-50.
- Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Humane-Computer Studies, 45(2), 185-213
- Smith, M.S., & Stein, M.K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344-350.
- Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Suh, J., & Moyer, P.S. (2007). Developing students’ representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155-173.
- Tobias, S. (1982). When do instructional methods. Educational Researcher, 11(4), 4–9. .
- Zbiek, R.M., Heid, M.K., Blume, G.W., & Dick, T.P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: The perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 1169-1207). Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References### Slides

- presentation_3065_44068.ppt (Access with Subscription)