You are here:

Guiding Students in Collaborative Writing of Wikipedia Articles – How to Get Beyond the Black Box Practice in Information Literacy Instruction? PROCEEDINGS

, , University of Tampere, Finland

AACE Award

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Tampere, Finland ISBN 978-1-939797-08-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a case study on teachers’ practices in guiding students on a Wikipedia writing assignment in information literacy (IL) instruction. The point of departure is the tension between traditional teacher-centred pedagogical practices and learner-centred assignments. The concept of the Wikipedia writing assignment was developed by a team of literature teachers. A history teacher applied the assignment in her class and made it possible to collect comparative data from another subject. Guided Inquiry – a research-based teaching model for information literacy instruction – was used as an analytical framework to compare two case courses. The findings characterize the black box problem in designing and guiding student-centred learning assignments: the teacher mainly focuses on introducing the assignment and assessing the outcome. However, an emerging approach emphasizing the guidance during the assignment process was also identified in one of the case courses.

Citation

Sormunen, E. & Alamettälä, T. (2014). Guiding Students in Collaborative Writing of Wikipedia Articles – How to Get Beyond the Black Box Practice in Information Literacy Instruction?. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2122-2130). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 17, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259.
  2. Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  3. Chu, S.K.W., Chow, K., Tse, S., & Kuhlthau, C.C. (2008). Grade 4 Students’ Development of Research Skills Through Inquiry-Based Learning Projects. School Libraries Worldwide, 14(1), 10–37.
  4. Chu, S.K.W., Tse, S., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library and Information Science Research, 33(2), 132–143.
  5. Heinström, J., & Sormunen, E. (2013). Students’ collaborative inquiry– relation to approaches to studying and instructional intervention. In I. Huvila (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Association for Information Science and Technology ASIS& T European Workshop 2013 (pp. 19–32). Turku: Åbo Akademi University. Retrieved from
  6. Kiili, C., Laurinen, L., & Marttunen, M. (2008). Students Evaluating Internet Sources: From Versatile Evaluators to Uncritical Readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 75–95. Doi:10.2190/EC.39.1.e
  7. Kiili, C., Laurinen, L., & Marttunen, M. (2009). Skillful Internet reader is metacognitively competent. In L.T.. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Hanbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 Level: Issues and challenges (Vol. II, pp. 654–668).
  8. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361–371. Doi:oi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5%3C361::AIDASI6%3E3.0.CO;2-%23
  9. Kuhlthau, C.C. (2004). Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
  10. Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2007). Guided inquiry. Learning in the 21th century. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
  11. Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2012). Guided Inquiry design (P. 188). Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.
  12. Kuusilehto-Awale, L., & Lahtero, T. (2014). Finnish Case of Basic Education for All– With Quality Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education and Research, 4(1), 1–18.
  13. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed., P. 296). New York: Open
  14. Marchionini, G. (2006). Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 41–46.
  15. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In I.K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Sormunen, E., Alamettälä, T., & Heinström, J. (2013). The Teacher’s Role as Facilitator of Collaborative Learning in Information Literacy Assignments. In S. Kurbanoğlu, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, R. Catts, & S. Špiranec (Eds.), Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice SE-67 (Vol. 397, pp. 499–506). Springer International Publishing.
  17. Sormunen, E., Heinström, J., Romu, L., & Turunen, R. (2012). A method for the analysis of information use in source-based writing. Information Research, 17(4), paper 535. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/17-4/paper535.htmlSormunen,E.,&Lehtiö,L.(2011).AuthoringWikipediaarticlesasaninformationliteracyassignment–copy-pastingorexpressingnewunderstandinginone’sownwords?InformationResearch,16(4).Retrievedfromhttp://informationr.net/ir/164/paper503.html
  18. Sormunen, E., Tanni, M., & Heinström, J. (2013). Students’ engagement in collaborative knowledge construction in group assignments for information literacy. Information Research, 18(3), paper C40. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/183/colis/paperC40.html #.UoTV3eJZ7ZU
  19. Vakkari, P. (2010). Exploratory searching as conceptual exploration. In HCIR 2010: Proceedings of of the Fourth Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (pp. 24–27). Microsoft Research. Retrieved from
  20. Wildemuth, B.M., & Freund, L. (2012). Assigning search tasks designed to elicit exploratory search behaviors. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval-HCIR ’12 (pp. 1–10). New York, New York, USA:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides