You are here:

Using Design-Based Research to Promote Faculty Knowledge of Technology Enhanced Teaching PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , Brock University, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


This paper describes an initiative in which the goal was to build faculty knowledge about technology enhanced teaching, develop a collaborative learning and research community of faculty members around technology enhanced teaching, and provide opportunities for faculty to serve as future workshop facilitators and mentors for other faculty and students. Using a design-based research approach, data sources included workshop evaluation surveys, photographs of workshops in progress, researcher field notes, and narrative case reports constructed by faculty members actively involved in the collaborative research. Findings indicated that the Digital Pedagogies Collaboration was effective because it was: 1) based on faculty members’ expressed instructional needs, 2) used a TPACK-based professional learning workshop model that translated TPACK principles into practical classroom application, and 3) uniquely included a research collaboration documenting changing teaching practices.


Jaipal Jamani, K., Figg, C., Gallagher, T., McQuirter Scott, R. & Ciampa, K. (2014). Using Design-Based Research to Promote Faculty Knowledge of Technology Enhanced Teaching. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2537-2543). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved September 20, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map


  1. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers& Education, 52(1), 154-168.
  3. Bachmair, B., Cook, J., & Kress, G.R. (2010). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. London: Springer.
  4. Bai, H., & Lehman, J. (2003). Impact of a professional development project on university faculty members’ perceptions and use of technology. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications,, 2003(1) 1927-1934.
  5. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P.L. Peterson, E. Baker& B. McGaw (Eds.), Third international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7 ed., pp. 548556).
  6. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council,
  7. Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
  8. Figg, C., Griffin, S., Lu, C., & Vietgen, P. (2008). New faculty cross borders through self-study in teacher education: Global horizons. Brock Education, (1)17-33.
  9. Figg, C., & Jaipal, K. (2012). TPACK-in-Practice: Developing 21st century teacher knowledge. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (pp. 4683-4689). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Online at Figg, C., & Jaipal, K. (2013a). Reflecting on the nature of the research question for practising collaborative action research. In J. Bennett and R. Dawson (Eds). Teachers Learning Together: Lessons from collaborative action research in practice. Toronto: Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario (ETFO).
  10. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.
  11. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
  12. Hung, H., & Yeh, H. (2013). Forming a change environment to encourage professional development through a teacher study group. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 153-165.
  13. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers' knowledge, practice, student outcomes& Efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 128.
  14. Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2010). Unpacking the “Total PACKage”: Emergent TPACK characteristics from a study of preservice teachers teaching with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 415-441.
  15. Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2013). The TPACK-in-Practice Workshop Approach: A shift from learning the tool to learning about technology-enhanced teaching. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on e-Learning (ICEL) 2013, Volume 2 (pp. 215-223), SA: Cape Town.
  16. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Designing training and peer coaching: Our needs for learning. VA: ASCD,
  17. Lan, J. (2001). Web-based instruction for education faculty: A needs assessment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(4), 385-399.
  18. Matrix, S. (2012). Challenges, opportunities, and new expectations challenges, opportunities, and new expectations challenges, opportunities, and new expectations challenges, opportunities, and new expectations. Academic Matters, (May), 3-6.
  19. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  20. Niess, M.L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact