You are here:

Shortcomings of Learning Design Approaches And a Possible Way Out
PROCEEDINGS

, , Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

Shifting away from traditional instructional design to younger research streams like personalized, workflow-based or collaborative e-learning, learning design (LD) has become an important issue in the field of technology-enhanced learning. Nevertheless, current LD approaches turn out to be rather unhandy or costly in teaching and research practice. In this paper, we discuss these shortcomings and propose an alternative solution approach which is based on a web application mashup, learner interactions, and a semantic layer for tool recommendations. As the evaluation of our first prototype is in progress, we can not highlight first experiences, but outline benefits and possible application scenarios in this position paper.

Citation

Mödritscher, F. & Wild, F. (2008). Shortcomings of Learning Design Approaches And a Possible Way Out. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 5314-5319). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 16, 2022 from .

© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Akhras, F.N., & Self, J.A. (2000). System Intelligence in Constructivist Learning. In: International Journal of
  2. Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., Dougiamas, M., Vogten, H., & Koper, R. (2007). A First Step Mapping IMS Learning Design and Moodle. In: Journal of Universal Computer Science 13(7) (pp. 683-690).
  3. Conlan, O. (2005). The Multi-Model, Metadata Driven Approach to Personalised eLearning Services. Dissertation. University of Dublin.
  4. Dalziel, J. (2003). Implementing learning design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, & J. Baron (Eds.): Interact Integrate Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 593-596).
  5. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.
  6. Ghidini, C., Pammer, V., Scheir, P., Serafini, L., & Lindstaedt, S. (2007). APOSDLE: learn@work with Semantic Web Technology. In K. Tochtermann, W. Haas, F. Kappe, A. Scharl, T. Pellegrini, & S. Schaffert: Proceedings of the International Conferences on New Media Technology and Semantic Systems (pp. 262-269).
  7. Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning. In: Educational Technology& Society 7(3) (pp. 97-111).
  8. Kulathuramaiyer, N. (2007). Mashups: Emerging Application Development Paradigm for a Digital Journal. In: Journal of Universal Computer Science 13(4) (pp. 531-542).
  9. Mödritscher, F. (2006). E-Learning Theories in Practice: A Comparison of three Methods. In: Journal of Universal Science and Technology of Learning 0(0) (pp. 3-18).
  10. Mödritscher, F., Neumann, G., García-Barrios, V.M., & Wild, F. (2008). A Web Application Mashup Approach for eLearning. In: Proceedings of the OpenACS and.LRN Conference (pp. 105-110).
  11. Mödritscher, F., & Sindler, A. (2005). Quizzes are not enough to reach high-level learning objectives! In P. Kommers, & G. Richards (Eds.): Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia& Telecommunications (pp. 3275-3278).
  12. OpenACS (2006). ANN IMS-LD V.0.1d tagged and released. Available at: http://openacs.org/forums/messageview?message_id=467112 (2007-12-19).
  13. Park, O., & Lee, J. (2004). Adaptive Instructional Systems. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.): Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 651 – 684). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Specht, M., & Burgos, D. (2007). Modeling Adaptive Educational Methods with IMS Learning Design. In D. Burgos (Ed.): Adaptation and IMS Learning Design: Journal of Interactive Media in Education (pp. 1-13).
  15. Spoerri, A. (2007). Visual Mashup of Text and Media Search Results. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Information Visualization (pp. 216-222).
  16. Vogten, H., Martens, H., Nadolski, R., Tattersall, C., Van Rosmalen, P., & Koper, R. (2006). Integrating IMS Learning Design and IMS Question and Test Interoperability using CopperCore Service Integration. In:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References