You are here:

Boundary Crossings: An Activity Theoretical Analysis of Technology Diffusion in a Teacher Education Program
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , Michigan State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Antonio, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-61-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Abstract: Technology diffusion refers to the process of spreading a program of technology use across/throughout an organization, program, etc. We used activity theory to frame the research design and analysis of a qualitative study with the goal of understanding the activity of technology diffusion across a large teacher preparation (TE) program. This study explored the boundary crossing collaborative activities of a diverse group of individuals as they set their goals, encountered contradictions, and created innovations directed toward preparing teachers to use technology to address authentic problems of practice in flexible ways. The results showed that participant's activity changed collaborative and communication structures in the College of Education (COE), as well as institutionalized some innovations. We also discuss the usefulness of activity theory as a model to frame research and analysis because application of the model at the beginning stages of work could help participants to anticipate and prepare for contradictions in advance.

Citation

Peruski, L., Mishra, P., Rosaen, C. & Koehler, M. (2007). Boundary Crossings: An Activity Theoretical Analysis of Technology Diffusion in a Teacher Education Program. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2007--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1647-1653). San Antonio, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bird, T., & Rosaen, C.L. (2005). Providing authentic contexts for learning information technology in teacher preparation. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education (JTATE), 13(2), 211-231. [online]. Available: http://D.aace.org/16975
  2. Bruce, B.C. (1993). Innovation and social change. In B.C. Bruce, J.K. Peyton, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms (pp. 9-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
  3. Engestrom, Y. And Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, and R. Punamaki, (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Engestrom, Y. (2000a). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath, (Eds.), Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design (pp. 150-166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Kongrith, K., Lamitina, D. & Vidoni, K. (2003). Faculty Development in Higher Education: Graduate Assistants Helping Education Faculty with Technology Integration. In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price& R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (pp. 2248-2249). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  5. Kuutti, K. (1997). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge,
  6. Otero, V., Peressini, D., Meymaris, K.A., Ford, P., Garvin, T., Harlow, D., Reidel, M., Waite, B., & Mears, C. (2005). Integrating technology into teacher education: A critical framework for implementing reform. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 56, No. 1, 8-23.
  7. Reyes, L., Mingo, C. & Wiburg, K. (2003). Journey Analysis: A Methodology for Understanding the Complex Change Process in a PT3 Project. In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price& R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (pp. 799-806). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  8. Rosaen, C.L. (2005). Teacher educators’ interactions with technology: How does it change us? In S. Rhine & M. Bailey (Eds.), Transforming learning through technology: Insights and achievements of the Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology program, pp. 103-114. Washington, DC: International Society for
  9. Sherry, L. And Chiero, R. (2004). Project TALENT: Infusing technology in K-12 field placements through a learning community model. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12 (2), 265-275.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.