You are here:

Teachers’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of a Blended Learning Approach for ICT Teacher Training
Article

, Department of Primary Education, National and kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 16, Number 4, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

The survey presented in this article examines teachers' perspectives of the effectiveness of the European Pedagogic ICT Licence pilot test in Greece. A total of 51 primary and secondary education teachers participated in the study, immediately following the blended training course. Data were gathered using both quantitative and qualitative research techniques such us a questionnaire, a semi-constructed interview, and a focus group discussion. Five main scales, based on the current online and blended learning literature, were identified to assess the effectiveness of the blended training process. These scales were (a) the learning process, (b) the facilitator's support, (c) the material, (d) the collaboration, and (e) the technology. In addition, a scale of satisfaction was included to measure the overall teachers' perception of the course effectiveness. The findings indicated that the teachers were satisfied with both their participation to the course and the knowledge they acquired from the training. The results also emerged a number of issues that would improve the effectiveness of the EPICT course.

Citation

Mouzakis, C. (2008). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of a Blended Learning Approach for ICT Teacher Training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 461-482. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved February 25, 2020 from .

© 2008 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 3-31). Athabasca, ab, Ca: athabasca university.
  2. British Educational Communications and Technology agency. (2005). Evidence on the progress of ICT in education. Retrieved January 29, 2007, from http://foi.becta.org.uk/content_files/corporate/resources/policy_and_strategy/board/0503-mar/becta_review_2005.pdf
  3. Collis, B., & Jung, I. S. (2003). Uses of information and communication technologies in teacher education. In B. Robinson & C. Latchem (Eds.), Teacher education through open and distance learning (pp. 171-192). London: routledgeFalmer.
  4. Cox, M. J., & Webb, M. (2004). An investigation of the research evidence relating to ICT pedagogy. Coventry: becta/DfEs.
  5. European Commission. (2004). ICT in education and training, Work program implementation of education and training 2010. Retrieved January 16, 2007, form http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/info2004.pdf European Pedagogic iCT licence, The. (2006). A web-based service for the professional development of teachers. Retrieved February 14, 2007, from http://www.epict.org/presentations/index.html
  6. Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science related attitudes. Perth, australia: australian Council for Educational research.
  7. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and application, Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.
  8. Fryndenberg, J. (2002). Quality standards in elearning: A matrix of analysis, international review of research in open and distance learning, athabasca, ab, Ca: athabasca university.
  9. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  10. Hanson, K., & Clem, F. (2006). To blend or not to blend: a look at community development via blended learning strategies. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 136-149). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  11. Institute for higher Education. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in internet-based distance education. Retrieved February 11, 2007, from http://www2.nea.org/he/abouthe/images/Quality.pdf
  12. Jones, A. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Coventry: becta/DfEs.
  13. Jung, I. (2005). ICT-Pedagogy integration in teacher training: application cases worldwide. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 94-101.
  14. Kante, C. (2002). E-training: The new frontier of the teacher professional development. TechKnowLogia, 4(4), 12-14.
  15. Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. Educause Quarterly, 26(1), 18-23.
  16. Ministry of Economy and Finance. (2006). The Greek digital strategy 20062013. Retrieved January 11, 2007, from http://www.infosoc.gr/infosoc/enuk/sthnellada/committee/default1/top.html
  17. Schwartzman, R., & Tuttle, H.V. (2002). What can online course components teach about improving instruction and learning? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(3), 179–188.
  18. Vosniadou, S., & Kollias, V. (2001). Information and communication technology and the problem of a teacher training: myths, dreams, and the harsh reality. Themes in Education, 4(2), 341-366.
  19. Walker, S., & Fraser, B. (2004, april). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning environments survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the american Educational research association, san Diego, Ca.
  20. Walker, S.L. (2002). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning environments survey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Curtin university, Curtin, Wa, australia.
  21. Wallace, R. (2003). Online learning in higher education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication and Information, 3(2), 241-280.
  22. Wingard, R.G. (2004). Classroom teaching in web-enhanced courses: a multiinstitutional study. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1, 26–35.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections