You are here:

One to One Computing in Higher Education: A Survey of Technology Practices and Needs
Article

, , , , , , , , Arizona State University, United States

AACE Journal Volume 15, Number 4, ISSN 1065-6901 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the computing needs and practices of students at Arizona State University as a means of assisting the university in the decision to implement a one to one (l:1) computing model, in which every student is equipped with a laptop. A web-based survey was solicited to students by way of targeted email messages. Results indicated that 81% of students consider a laptop to be very important to their success in college. However, only 60% of students reported that they would be willing to purchase a laptop if their program required it, with financial aid as the most preferred purchasing option. Students desired more technology in the classroom as well as on campus to enhance their educational experience.

Citation

DiGangi, S., Kilic, Z., Yu, C.H., Jannasch-Pennel, A., Long, L., Kim, C.H., Stay, V. & Kang, S. (2007). One to One Computing in Higher Education: A Survey of Technology Practices and Needs. AACE Journal, 15(4), 367-387. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Albion, P. (1999, August). “Laptop orthodoxy: Is portable computing the answer for education?” Australian Educational Computing, 14(1). Retrieved August 14, 2006, from http://www.acce.edu.au/journal/journals/vol14_1.pdf Apple Computer, Inc. (2005). Research: What it says about 1 to 1 learning. Retrieved November 23, 2005, from http://ubiqcomputing.org/Apple_1-to1_Research.pdf.
  2. Belanger, Y., & Menzies, D. (2005). Duke university iPod first year experience final evaluation report. Retrieved November 23, 2005, from http://cit.duke.edu/pdf/Ipod_initiative_04_05.pdf
  3. Berque, D., Bonebright, T., & Whitesell, M. (2004). Using pen-based computers across the computer science curriculum. ACM SIGSE Bulletin, 36(1), 61-65.
  4. Brown, R. (2005). Colleges& Universities with laptop or notebook computer initiatives. Retrieved August 5 , 2007 , from http://www2.westmiNster-mo.Edu/wc_users/homepages/staff/brownr/NoteBookList.html
  5. Burrill, D. (1999). Re: Normalization. Educational statistics discussion list (EDSTAT-L). Available e-mail: edstat-l@jse.stat.ncsu.edu
  6. Campus Computing Project (2005). Growing concern about campus IT security: S low progress on IT disaster recovery planning. Retrieved February 6 , 2006 , from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/2005/index.html
  7. Campus Technology (2005). Mobility initiatives on campus: A “virtual” roundtable. Retrieved February 6, 2006 , from http://content.gateway.com/Www.gateway.com/work/pdf/edu/Mobility_Initiatives.pdf
  8. Carlson, S. (2000). Universities find wireless systems bring them conve-n ience and savings. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved August 5 , 2007 , from http://chronicle.com/free/2000/10/2000101101t.htm
  9. Edwards, S.H., & Barnette, N.D. (2004, October). Experiences using tablet PCs in a programming laboratory. Proceedings of the Special Interest
  10. Hawkins, B.L., Rudy, J.A., & Nicolich, R. (2005). EDUCAUSE core data service fiscal year 2004 summary report. Retrieved March 29, 2006, from http://www.educause.edu/Ir/library/pdf/pub8002.pdf
  11. Intel (2005). Most unwired college campuses. Retrieved August 5, 2007, from http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20051011corp.htm
  12. Kvavik, R.B., & Caruso, J.B. (2005). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005 : Convenience, connection, control, and learning. Educause, 6. Retrieved November 23 , 2005 , from http://www.educause.edu/Ir/library/pdf/ers0506/rs/ers0506w.pdf
  13. Landry, S., Fountain, E., & Mirliss, D. (2005). Using external data sources to increase confidence in assessment conclusions. Retrieved November 23, 2005 , from http://www.educause.edu/ Ir / library /powerpoint/
  14. Muir, M. (2005). A model for successful 1-to-1 learning with laptop initiatives. The Maine Learning with LaptopS tud ies. Retrieved August 14, 2006, from http://www.mcmel.org/MLLS/eval/model.html
  15. Muir, M., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2004). The power of one to one. Early findings from the Maine learning technology initiative. Learning& Leading with Technology, 32(3), 6-8.
  16. Robinett, C., Leight, M., Malinowski, C., & Butler, J. (2005). Higher education mobile learning handbook. Retrieved November 23, 2005, from http://www.centerdigitaled.com/ Index.php
  17. Schacter, J. (1995). The impact of education technology on student achievement. What the most current research has to say. M i lken Family Foundation. Santa Mon ica , CA. Retrieved August 14 , 2006 , from http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME161.pdf
  18. Tyler, L. (2005). ICT literacy: Equipping students to succeed in an information-rich, technology-based society. Retrieved November 23, 2005, from http://www.sc.edu/fye/resources/assessment/essays/Tyler-11.3.05.html
  19. Warwick, D.P., & Lininger, C.A. (1975). The sample survey: Theory and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  20. Yu, C.H. (1999). M isconce ived relationships among sample, sampling distribution, and population. Retrieved Feb 7, 2006 from, http://www.creative-wisdom.com/computer/sas/parametric.html

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.