Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Phoenix, AZ, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-55-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
We introduce Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) as a way of representing what teachers need to know about technology, and argue for the role of authentic design-based activities in the development of this knowledge. We report data from a faculty development design seminar in which faculty members worked together with masters students to develop online courses. We developed and administered a survey that assessed the evolution of student- and faculty-participants' learning and perceptions about the learning environment, theoretical and practical knowledge of technology, course content (the design of online courses), group dynamics, and the growth of TPCK. Analyses focused on observed changes between the beginning and end of the semester. Results indicate that learning by design appears to be an effective instructional technique to develop deeper understandings of relationships between content, pedagogy and technology and the contexts in which they function.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. (2005). Educational Technology by Design: Results from a Survey Assessing its Effectiveness. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2005--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1511-1517). Phoenix, AZ, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 17, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/19255/.
© 2005 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2), 141-178.
- Bruce, B. & Levin, J. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 79-102.
- Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 9-13.
- Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
- Dewey, J., & Bentley, A.F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon.
- Handler, M.G. & Strudler, N. (1997). The ISTE foundation standards: Issues of implementation. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13(2), 16-23.
- Keating, T. & Evans, E. (2001, April). Three computers in the back of the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of technology integration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
- Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
- Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2004, April). Content, pedagogy, and technology: Testing a model of technology integration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2004, San Diego.
- Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Yahya, K., & Yadav, A. (2004). Successful teaching with technology: The complex interplay of content, pedagogy, and technology. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education, Atlanta, GA. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Lundeberg, M.A., Bergland, M., Klyczek, K., & Hoffman, D. (2003). Using action research to develop preservice teachers' beliefs, knowledge and confidence about technology. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1 (4). Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://ncolr.uidaho.com/jiol/archives/2003/spring/toc.as P
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2003). Not “what” but “how”: Becoming design-wise about educational technology. In Y. Zhao. (Ed.). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices (pp. 99-122). Greenwich,
- Mishra, P., Spiro, R., & Feltovich, P. (1996). Technology representation, and cognition: The prefiguring of knowledge in cognitive flexibility hypertexts. In H. Van Oostendorp& A. De Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 287-305). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
- Rosenblatt, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
- Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review. 57 (1), 1-22.
- Wise, A. (2000). The future of the teaching profession. In The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (Eds.) Log On or Lose Out: Technology in 21st Century Teacher Education (pp. 219-224). Washington,
- Zhao, Y. (Ed.) (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Unraveling the Mystery of EFL Teachers’ Professional Development in Computer Assisted Language Learning: A Reflective Approach
Jun-jie Jack Tseng, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (Mar 02, 2009) pp. 4160–4168
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.