A case study of the interactive evaluation system for Teacher-Centered Instruction and Student-Centered Instruction
Purchase or Subscription required for access
Purchase individual articles and papers
Subscribe for faster access!
Subscribe and receive access to 100,000+ documents, for only $19/month (or $150/year).
Already have access?
Institutional Subscription
You don't appear to be accessing the site through a subscribing institution (your IP address is 44.204.164.147).
If your university, college, or library subscribes to LearnTechLib, you may be able access full text articles through a login page.
You can search for your instition by name or by location.
Authors
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, 2004 in Lugano, Switzerland ISBN 978-1-880094-53-2
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to explore the differences of two teachers, one with student- centered approach and the other with teacher-centered approach, using the same interactive evaluation tool (EduClick). The researchers compared the differences between two teachers in terms of instructional strategies, higher-order thinking skills, interactions between teacher and students, informal instructional talk and students talk, teacher's roles and students' roles in the classroom, evaluation strategies and students' responses. In this case study, the researchers found that teachers with teacher-centered approach or student-centered approach could have effective teaching when they have a good instructional design and use the tool (such as EduClick) appropriately to create an interactive learning environment.
Citation
Lin, S.r. & Teng, H.T. (2004). A case study of the interactive evaluation system for Teacher-Centered Instruction and Student-Centered Instruction. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1438-1443). Lugano, Switzerland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/12664.
© 2004 AACE