Search results for author:"Do-Hong Kim"
Total records matched: 8 Search took: 0.042 secs
You may get more results with author:"Do-Hong Kim".
Computer-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration Mode Effects on a Statewide End-of-Course English Test
Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol. 68, No. 4 (2008) pp. 554–570
The current study compared student performance between paper-and-pencil testing (PPT) and computer-based testing (CBT) on a large-scale statewide end-of-course English examination. Analyses were conducted at both the item and test levels. The...
Factor Structure Analysis of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Scale on International Students
Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol. 70, No. 4 (August 2010) pp. 695–709
The authors investigated the factor structure of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence (SSREI) scale on international students. Via confirmatory factor analysis, the authors tested the fit of the models reported by Schutte et al. and five...
A Comparison of Computer-Based Testing and Pencil-and-Paper Testing for Students with a Read-Aloud Accommodation
Journal of Special Education Technology Vol. 26, No. 1 (2011) pp. 1–12
This study examined the academic performance and preference of students with disabilities for two types of test administration conditions, computer-based testing (CBT) and pencil-and-paper testing (PPT). Data from a large-scale assessment program...
Examining measurement properties of an English Self-Efficacy scale for English language learners in Korea
International Journal of Educational Research Vol. 59, No. 1 (2013) pp. 24–34
This study provides evidence for the validity of the Questionnaire of English Self-Efficacy in a sample of 167 college students in Korea. Results show that the scale measures largely satisfy the Rasch model for unidimensionality. The rating scale...
Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies Vol. 23, No. 7 (October 2007) pp. 999–1011
Student evaluations should “be ethical, fair, useful, feasible, and accurate” [JCSEE (2003). The student evaluation standards. Arlen Gullickson, Chair. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin]. This study focuses on defining ethical behavior and examining...
Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Online Administration Modes of the Statewide English Test for Students with and without Disabilities
Educational Assessment Vol. 15, No. 2 (2010) pp. 107–121
This study investigated whether scores obtained from the online and paper-and-pencil administrations of the statewide end-of-course English test were equivalent for students with and without disabilities. Score comparability was evaluated by...
American Journal of Evaluation Vol. 29, No. 4 (2008) pp. 520–530
"The Student Evaluation Standards" call for student evaluations to be ethical, fair, useful, feasible, and accurate. However, little is known about educators' perceptions about the ethics of student evaluation practices. This study was designed to...
Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment Vol. 6, No. 4 (December 2007)
This study examined comparability of student scores obtained from computerized and paper-and-pencil formats of the large-scale statewide end-of-course (EOC) examinations in the two subject areas of Algebra and Biology. Evidence in support of...