
The Design and Sequencing of eLearning Interactions:A Grounded Approach
Article
Atsusi Hirumi, University of Houston–Clear Lake, United States
International Journal on E-Learning Volume 1, Number 1, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
In traditional classroom settings, good educators interpret verbal and non-verbal cues, clarify expectations, provide immediate feedback, facilitate activities, promote discussions, elaborate concepts, render guidance, and provide timely and appropriate feedback as they present content in an clear and engaging manner. In contrast, key interactions that occur spontaneously in classroom settings must be carefully planned and sequenced as an integral part of eLearning. Examination of three basic questions provides insights into the eLearning process: How does eLearning differ from other modes of instruction? What are meaning eLearning interactions? How do you design and sequence meaningful eLearning interactions? This article chronicles knowledge gained from seeking answers to these fundamental questions and posits a five-step process for designing and sequencing eLearning interactions based on a combination of research, theory and experience.
Citation
Hirumi, A. (2002). The Design and Sequencing of eLearning Interactions:A Grounded Approach. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(1), 19-27. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 21, 2022 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8390/.
© 2002 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- American Society for Training and Development (2001). Www.Breakthebarriers.com [Online]. Orinda, CA: Authors.
- Bates, A.W. (1990). Third generation distance education: The challenge of new technology. Paper presented at the XV World Conference on Distance Education, Caracas, Venezuela. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 688)
- Beare, P.L. (1989). The comparative effectiveness of videotape, audiotape, and telelecture in delivering continuing teacher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 57-66.
- Bednar, A., Cunningham, D.J., Duffy, T., & Perry, D. (1995). Theory in practice: How do we link? In G. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (2nd ed., pp. 100-112). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
- Bermudez, A., & Hirumi, A. (2000). Examining the effectiveness of systematically designed web-based instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 1-12.
- Bonk, C.J., & King, K. (1998). Computer conferencing and collaborative writing tools: Starting a dialogue about student dialogue. In C.J. Bonk & K. King (Eds.). Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 3-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
- Jonassen, D.H. (1995, June). An instructional design model for designing constructivist learning environments. World Conference on Educational Media, Graz, Austria.
- Clark, R.E. (1994). Media and method. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 7-10.
- Kearsley, G. (1997). A guide to on-line education [Online]. (May 25, 1997) Available: http://www.fcae.nova.edu/~kearsley/on-line.htm
- Cuban, L. (1993). How teacher taught (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Kemp, J.E., Morrison, G.R., & Ross, S.M. (1994). Designing effective instruction. NY: Macmillan College Publishing.
- Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2000). The systematic design of instruction (5th edition). New York: Addison-Wesley.
- Mason, R., & Kaye, T. (1990). Toward a new paradigm for distance education. In L.M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 15-30). New York:
- Merrill, D., Li, Z., & Jones, M.K. (1990). Second generation instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(2), 7-15.
- Moore, M.G. (1995). The 1995 distance education research symposium: A research agenda. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 1-6.
- Moore, M.G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
- Mortera-Gutierrez, F. & Murphy, K. (2000). Instructor interactions in distance education environments: A case study. Concurrent
- Hill, N., Williams, R., & Hirumi, A. (2001). Facilitating the development of e-Learning through a support site. Concurrent session presented at the annual Texas Distance Learning Association conference, Houston, TX.
- Hillman, D.C., Willis, D.J. & Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learnerinterface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42.
- Hirumi, A. (2000). Chronicling the challenges of Web-basing a degree program: A systems perspective. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1(2), 89-108.
- Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), 31-39.
- Shale, D., & Garrison, D.R. (1990). Education and communication. In D.R. Garrison & D. Shale (Eds.), Education at a distance (pp. 23-39). Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger.
- Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Soby, M. (1990). Traversing distances in education: The PortaCOM Experiment. In A.W. Bates (Ed.), Media and technology in European distance education. Proceedings of the EADTU workshop on media, methods and technology (pp. 241-247).
- Hirumi, A., Willis, J., Frey, J., & Gause, C. (2001). Online TEKS training: Educating Texas teachers on the TA of TEKS. Concurrent session presented at the annual Texas Distance Learning Association conference. Houston, TX.
- Weller, H.G. (1988). Interactivity in microcomputer-based instruction: Its essential components and how it can be enhanced. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(2), 23-27.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences
Michael Ward, Gary Peters & Kyna Shelley, The University of Southern Mississippi
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 11, No. 3 (Oct 13, 2010) pp. 57–77
-
Evaluating types of students' interactions in a wiki-based collaborative learning project
Maria Prokofieva, Victoria University
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 29, No. 4 (Sep 22, 2013)
-
Enhancing Students Online Interactions in Online Learning Environment
Wei-Ying Hsiao, Southern Utah University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (Mar 29, 2010) pp. 1464–1468
-
An Effective Pedagogical Model for the Adoption of e-Learning Platform
Wei-Mann Lee, The Overseas Chinese Institute of Technology, Taiwan; Yung-Sheng Chang, National Taichung Institute of Technology, Taiwan
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (Mar 03, 2008) pp. 2078–2085
-
Adopting Seven Principles in a Skill-based e-Learning Course
David Wei-Mann Lee, Overseas Chinese Institute of Technology, Taiwan; Nicole Pei-Wen Huang, National Formosa University, Taiwan; Po-Ying Wang & I-Fang Ho, Overseas Chinese Institute of Technology, Taiwan
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (October 2005) pp. 860–865
-
The Role of Interaction in Enhancing Achievement and Student Satisfaction in an Online Course: A Rubric Analysis
Belle Alderman, University of Canberra, Australia
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (October 2005) pp. 214–219
-
A novel Approach to e-Content Development Process: Complexity Reduction and Process Automation
Elijah Omwenga, Michael Njoroge & Erastus Kanyingi, University of Nairobi, Kenya
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 3475–3480
-
Optimizing e-Learning Effect with the Right Technological Solution
David Weimann Lee & I-Fang Ho, The Overseas Chinese Institute of Technology, Taiwan; Nicole P. W. Huang, National Formosa University, Taiwan
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 3223–3228
-
Development and Application of an Objectives-driven eContent Structuring and Deployment Model
Elijah Omwenga & Timothy Waema, University of Nairobi, Kenya; Georges Eisendrath & Arno Libotton, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 573–578
-
Faculty Best Practices for Promoting Student Interaction in Online Courses
Rita Dobbs & W. Clayton Allen, The University of Texas at Tyler, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2003 (2003) pp. 3076–3078
-
Beyond the Discussion Board: Exploring the Use of CMC in Online Teacher Education
Judi Repman, Randal Carlson & Cordelia Zinskie, Georgia Southern University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (2004) pp. 652–654
-
Principles of Educational Web Design
Hafize Keser & Necmi Esgi, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Turkey; Aytac Simsek, IDD&E, Syracuse University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003 (2003) pp. 2011–2014
-
Interactive Communication Tools in E-Learning: What Works?
Judi Repman, Randal Carlson & Cordelia Zinskie, Georgia Southern University, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (2004) pp. 1443–1448
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.