
Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions on Learning and Using Interactive Whiteboards
PROCEEDINGS
Hsin-Te Yeh, Metropolitan State College of Denver, United States ; Yi-Chia Cheng, Tamkang University, Taiwan ; Miri Chung, Metropolitan State College of Denver, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-92-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
Abstract
The use of interactive whiteboards has been more and more ubiquitous in K-12 schools. To equip pre-service teachers with the knowledge and skills of interactive whiteboards, it is important to offer them the opportunity to learn and use interactive whiteboards in teacher preparation programs. The purpose of this study is to understand pre-service teachers’ perceptions on learning and using interactive whiteboards in educational technology classes. The interactive whiteboard used in this study is SMART Board. The result of the study will provide directions for making course content on SMART Board more helpful, useful, and student-friendly.
Citation
Yeh, H.T., Cheng, Y.C. & Chung, M. (2012). Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions on Learning and Using Interactive Whiteboards. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1298-1300). Austin, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 13, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/39759/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Al-Qirim, N. (2011). Determinants of interactive whiteboard success in teaching in higher education institutions. Computers& Education, 56(3), 827–838.
- Blue. E. & Tirotta, R. (2011). The benefits& Drawbacks of integrating cloud computing and interactive whiteboards in teacher preparation. TechTrends, 55(3), 31-38.
- Doe, C. (2010). Interactive whiteboards. Multimedia& Internet@ Schools, 17(1), 30-34.
- Ertmer, P.A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
- Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102–117.
- Primary Grade Teachers See Role for Technology (2010). Electronic Education Report, 17(16), 1-3.
- Shenton, A. & Pagett, L. (2007). From ‘bored’ to screen: the use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms in England. Literacy, 41(3), 129-136.
- Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005).(cid:3) Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101.
- Somyurek, S., Atasoy, B., & Ozdemir, S. (2009). Board’s IQ: What makes a board smart? Computers& Education, 53(2) 368– 374.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References