You are here:

College Teachers’ Social Representations of Pedagogical Mediation and the Process of Mediatization When ICTs Are Used in Blended Learning and Distance Education
PROCEEDINGS

, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-90-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

This paper looks at the results of an exploratory and descriptive research carried out at the post-secondary level with college teachers integrating information and communications technologies (ICTs) in distance education. This research sought to identify the optimum conditions for implementing pedagogical and instrumental devices that support pedagogical mediation and the process of mediatization with regard to using ICTs in blended learning and distance education. The results obtained made it possible to identify the existence of distinct mediation and mediatization profiles adopted by our participants and the existence of central elements in social representations. Our results also showed the relevance of conducting further research to more fully document the particular reality of pedagogical interventions in distance education in colleges and highlighted the urgent need for understanding the causes of the slow development of its supply and demand as much from Quebec institutions as from the different clienteles.

Citation

Roy, V. (2011). College Teachers’ Social Representations of Pedagogical Mediation and the Process of Mediatization When ICTs Are Used in Blended Learning and Distance Education. In C. Ho & M. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2011--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1673-1682). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 19, 2021 from .

© 2011 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Abric, J.-C. (1987). Coopération, compétition et représentations sociales. Cousset (Fribourg), Switzerland: É dition Delval.
  2. Allen, E., & Siemens, J. (2010). Learning in Demand: Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved on January, 2011, from: http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/learningondemand.pdf
  3. Becue-Bertaud, M., & Lebart, L. (2000). Analyses statistiques de réponses ouvertes : application des enquêtes auprès de lycéens. In J. Moreau, P.-A. Doudin, & P. Cazes (Eds.), L ’ analyse des correspondances et les techniques connexes (pp.59 – 86).
  4. Bernard, R.M., Lou, Y., & Abrami, P.C., Wozney, L., Borokhovski, E., Wallet, P., Wade, A, & Fiset, M. (2003, April). Is distance education equivalent to classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  5. Depover, C., DeLievre, B., Deschryder, J., Quintin, J., Strebelle, A., & Lamme, A. (1998). Un modèle d ’ apprentissage à distance basé sur le partage des connaissances. Belgium: Université de Mons-Hainaut, Unité de Technologie de l ’ Éducation. Retrieved on January, 2011, from: http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/03/03/04/PDF/Doc200_1_.106.pdf
  6. Fortin, M.-F. (2006). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche. Montreal, Quebec: Chenelière Éducation.
  7. Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Gouvernement du Québec (1993). Des collèges pour le Québec du XXIe siècle. L ’ enseignement collégial québécois: orientations d ’ avenir et mesures de renouveau. Quebec: Ministère de l ’ Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport.
  9. Grenon, V. (2000). Méthodes factorielles en statistiques textuelle. Application à l ’ analyse du discours en matière
  10. Henri, F. (2003). Les campus virtuels, pourquoi et comment. In B. Charlier, & D. Peraya (Eds.). Technologie et innovation en pédagogie. Dispositifs innovants de formation pour l ’ enseignement supérieur (pp. 7 – 78). Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck.
  11. Jodelet, D. (1989). Folies et représentations sociales. Paris, France: PUF.
  12. Joye, F., Deschryver, N., & Peraya, D. (2003). Comment développer un campus virtuel? In B. Charlier, & D. Peraya (Eds.). Technologie et innovation en pédagogie. Dispositifs innovants de formation pour l ’ enseignement supérieur (pp. 93 – 102).
  13. Lebart, L., & Salem, A. (1994). Statistique textuelle. Paris, France: Dunod.
  14. Liebetrau, A.M. (1983). Measures of association. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences, vol. 32. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  15. Marchand, L. (2003). La formation par les TIC ou e-learning. Montreal, Quebec: Ministère de l ’
  16. Peraya, D. (2003). Qu ’ est-ce qu ’ un campus virtuel? In B. Charlier., & D. Peraya (Eds.), Technologie et innovation en pédagogie. Dispositifs innovants de formation pour l ’ enseignement supérieur (pp. 79 – 92). Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck.
  17. Peraya, D. (2010). Médiatisation et médiation : des médias éducatifs aux environnements numériques de travail. In V. Liquette (Ed.), Médiations, Collection Les Essentiels (pp. 35 – 48). Paris: CNRS É ditions.
  18. Reynolds, H.T. (1984). Analysis of nominal data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Slides

Also Read

Related Collections