You are here:

Adopting Interactive Whiteboards: An Education Win-Win Set Up? PROCEEDINGS

, Notre Dame University, Lebanon

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Interactive whiteboard sales representatives want to sell; universities want better learning outcomes; tech-support centers in the universities want to possess new technologies; educators want to be known as tech-supporters: Sabieh notes that it alludes to a win-win situation for all those around. The question is: Is it truly a win-win situation that one can say the atmosphere is promoting more innovative learning and teaching endeavors making the learning and teaching more challenging and exploratory for the students and educators alike. Case assessment is made; the purpose of the study is to show that education win-win may not be the actual outcome. Implications and recommendations are made.

Citation

Sabieh, C. (2011). Adopting Interactive Whiteboards: An Education Win-Win Set Up?. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1034-1039). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 16, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001, October). Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Technology, Pedagogy and education, 10 (3), 257278.
  2. Elliott, J. (2009). Does the Use of the interactive whiteboard increase student engagement? In I. Gibson et al.
  3. Hall, J. & Chamblee, G. (2009). Teacher perceptions of interactive whiteboards: a comparison of users and future-users at high school over a one year period. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for
  4. Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2004). Motivation: The contribution of interactive whiteboards to teaching and learning in mathematics. Retrieved from http://cerme4.crm.es/Papers%20definitius/9/Miller-Glover-Averis.pdf
  5. Nagata, T., Inagaki, T., Toyoda, M., Umegae, A., Sato, Y. & Akahori, K. (2009). Evaluation of an interactive whiteboards utilization model. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology&
  6. Saltan, F. & Arslan, K. (2009). A new teacher tool, interactive whiteboards: a meta analysis. In I. Gibson et al.
  7. Saltan, F., Arslan, K. & Gök, A. (2010). Teachers’ acceptance of interactive whiteboards: a case study. In D.
  8. Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (2), 91-101.
  9. Swan, K., Schenker, J., & Kratcoski, A. (2005). The effects of the use of interactive whiteboards on student achievement. Proceedings of SITE 2005 (1353-1355). AACE: Phoenix, Arizona.
  10. Turel, Y. (2010). Developing teachers’ utilization of interactive whiteboards. In D. Gibson& B. Dodge (Eds.),

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.