Student Participation in Online Debates Within and Across Course Offerings
Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers, University of South Alabama, United States ; Tuangrat Sriwongkol, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand ; Crystal A. Thomas, Stephanie McLendon, University of South Alabama, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
This study examined student participation in online debates from within and across four different course offerings using asynchronous discussions. The first debate included additional guidance for debating. The second debate, midway through each term, had less guidance. Content analyses showed that participants did engage in traditional forms of debate (i.e., argue, evidence, and so on). They also acknowledged each others' comments and went off-topic no matter the level of guidance provided. While quantity of messages lessened from the first debate to the second, the quality remained was maintained. Overall, there appeared to be consistent quality across course offerings. Researchers surmised that this was due, in part, that substantive participation was a course requirement, to the guidance given in the initial debate, and amount of practice students had in asynchronous discussions. Further research is suggested. Specific examples of the debates and coding system used will be shared at the presentation.
Davidson-Shivers, G.V., Sriwongkol, T., Thomas, C.A. & McLendon, S. (2008). Student Participation in Online Debates Within and Across Course Offerings. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3687-3694). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
ReferencesView References & Citations Map
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.Suggest Corrections to References
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
The Development of a Virtual Debating Game for Cultivating the Ability to Understand Diverse Values and Opinions.
Masahiro Ito & Toshiki Matsuda, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2013 (Jun 24, 2013) pp. 2070–2075
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.