
Assessing Students for Online Learning
Article
Anastasia Trekles Milligan, Janet A. Buckenmeyer, Purdue University Calumet, United States
International Journal on E-Learning, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
Distance education has dramatically increased the educational opportunities for underserved populations. This is evidenced by the fairly recent proliferation and success of online universities, and it is happening in spite of criticism of e-learning and online degree programs among academia and the popular press. As a result, many institutions, including traditional and respected universities across the country - who were once among the harshest critics - are now offering distance education courses. However, not all students who wish to enroll in online courses are ready or prepared to be successful completing online coursework. Research suggests that at least half of all students enrolled in online courses are not course completers. Obviously, increasing the percentage of program completers in the distance learning environment is essential. This article details a proven and comprehensive system to achieve this objective, using the authors' experiences at Purdue University Calumet in Hammond, Indiana, as a framework.
Citation
Milligan, A.T. & Buckenmeyer, J.A. (2008). Assessing Students for Online Learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(3), 449-461. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24447/.
© 2008 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Buchanan, E. (1999). Assessment measures: Pre-tests for successful distance teaching and learning? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(4). Retrieved September 17, 2004, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/buchanan24.html
- Combs, L. (2004). The design, assessment, and implementation of a web- based course. Association for the Advancement of Computing In Education, 12(1), 27-37.
- Egan, T.M., & Akdere, M. (2004). Distance learning roles and competencies: Exploring similarities and differences between professional and student perspectives. In T.M. Egan & M.L. Morris (Eds.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development 2004 Conference (pp. 930-937). Bowling Green, OH: Academy of Human Resource Development.
- Hiltz, S. R., & Shea, P. (2006). The student in the online classroom. In S.R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 145168), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Fredrickson, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning from on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2). Retrieved May 30, 2007, from http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/v4n2_fredericksen.asp
- Grant MacEwan College (2004). Student support literature review. Learn online at MacEwan College. Retrieved September 13, 2004, from http://stats.macewan.ca/learn/staff/studsupport.cfm Jun, J. (2005). Understanding e-dropout. International Journal on E-Learning, 4(2), 229-240. Lee, M. (2003). A critical analysis of andragogy: The perspective of foreign-born adult learners. In L.M. Baumgartner, M. Lee, S. Birden, & D. Flowers (Eds.), Adult learning theory: A primer (pp. 11-15). Columbus, OH: Center on Education and Training for Employment, The Ohio State University.
- Levy, S. (2003). Six factors to consider when planning distance learning programs in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(1). Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/search_results_id.php?id=185
- Lui, L., Maddux, C., & Johnson, L. (2004). Computer attitude and achievement: Is time an intermediate variable? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(4), 593-607.
- Maddux, C. (2004). Developing online courses: Ten myths. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 23(2), 27-33.
- Moore, J.C., Sener, J., & Fetzner, M. (2006). Getting better: ALN and student success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 10(3). Retrieved April 19, 2008 from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/jaln/v10n3/v10n3_6moore_member.asp
- Moore, M. (1986). Self-directed learning and distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 1(1). Retrieved April 19, 2008, from http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol1.1/moore.html
- Osborn, V. (2001). Identifying at-risk students in videoconferencing and web-based distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 41-54.
- Schulze, A., & O’Keefe, A. (2002). Effectively using self-assessments in online learning. In W. Winfried (Ed.), Distance Learning 2002: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning (pp. 369-373). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Schmidt, K. (2002). Students’ choice of learning methods: Seeking the best mix of face-to-face and e-interactions. In R. Lewis, K. Akahori, R. Kempt, T. Okamoto, L. Henderson, & C.H. Lee ( Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 205-206), Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
- Schrum, L. (2002). Dimensions and strategies for online success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 57-67.
- Summerville, J. (2005). Developing an online “code of conduct.” AACE Journal, 13(2), 127-136. Willis, B. (1994). Enhancing faculty effectiveness in distance education. In B. Willis (Ed.), Distance education: Strategies and tools, (pp. 277-290). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
- Zemsky, R., & Massy, W. (2004). Why the elearning boom went bust. Chronicle of Higher Education (on line
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References