
Best of The Netherlands: How children use computational thinking skills when they solve a problem using the Ozobot
PROCEEDING
Diane van der Linde, Nicole van der Aar, Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands ; Joke Voogt, University of Amsterdam/ Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands
BEST Award
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Amsterdam, Netherlands Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
An observation study has been conducted to find out which computational thinking skills children use when solving a programming task. The main question was “What are the thinking processes of young children in the age of 6-12 years old (grade 2-6), working in pairs when trying to program a small robot (Ozobot) to solve a given problem (programming task).” The pairs (n=42) were asked to think out loud when solving the problem and were video-taped. Five sub-skills of computational thinking skills were evaluated: problem decomposition, abstracting, data ordering, testing and debugging & solving problems. Findings showed that slightly less than half of the pairs successfully solved the task. Lower grade boy duos scored higher on the sub-skills than girl or mixed duos from the same grade. In the higher grades this difference disappeared. Successful pairs structure their work, eliminate options, take the time to test the solution and work accurately.
Citation
van der Linde, D., van der Aar, N. & Voogt, J. (2018). Best of The Netherlands: How children use computational thinking skills when they solve a problem using the Ozobot. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2151-2157). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 9, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/184224/.
© 2018 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2015). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670.
- Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5-6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers and Education, 63, 87–97. Http://doi.org/10.1016/J.compedu.2012.11.016
- Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., and Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problemsolving skills. In P. Griffin& E. Care (Eds.). In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 37–56). New
- Klahr, D., & Carver, S.M. (1988). Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 362–404.
- Lye, S.Y., & Koh, J.H.L. (2014).. Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12 ? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61.
- Pea, R.D., Kurland, D.M., & Hawkins, J. (1985). Logo and the Development of Thinking Skills. Children and Microcomputers: Research on the Newest Medium, 194–212.
- Sullivan, A., & Bers, M.U. (2013). Gender differences in kindergarteners’ robotics and programming achievement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 691–702. Http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9210-z
- Voogt, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Strien, J. (2017). Effecten van programmeeronderwijs op computational thinking-reviewstudie. Zwolle, Heerlen, Amsterdam: Windesheim, Open Universiteit, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
- Yelland, N. (1993). Young children’s learning with Logo: An analysis of strategies and interactions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9(4), 465–486.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References