You are here:

The influence of group size on nonmandatory asynchronous instructional discussion groups

, ,

Internet and Higher Education Volume 6, Number 3, ISSN 1096-7516 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd


In this study, the authors examined the effect of group size on students' behavior in asynchronous, nonmandatory instructional discussion groups. The focus in this study is on four main questions: (a) Does group size affect the proportion of learner–learner and instructor–learner interactions? (b) Does group size influence the number of messages instructors post? (c) Does group size have an effect on the number of contributions that students post? (d) Does group size affect instructor lag time as well as the interval between successive postings? It was found that group size affects all these aspects of asynchronous discussion: The proportion of learner–learner interaction increased as group size increased, while the proportion of instructor messages decreased. Most students participated to a minimal degree and only a small minority of students posted more than 10% of a discussion group's messages. Last, as group size increased, the interval between successive instructors' postings decreased; lag time, however, was not influenced by group size. Results are discussed in terms of the restructured theory of transactional distance by Gorsky & Caspi, 2003, and several explanations relating group size and students' behavior in asynchronous discussion group are suggested.


Caspi, A., Gorsky, P. & Chajut, E. (2003). The influence of group size on nonmandatory asynchronous instructional discussion groups. Internet and Higher Education, 6(3), 227-240. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved January 27, 2020 from .

This record was imported from Internet and Higher Education on January 29, 2019. Internet and Higher Education is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct:


Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact