Abstract

The use of instructional technologies such as PowerPoint[TM] and WebCT[TM] are nearly ubiquitous in contemporary college classrooms. The literature is rich with ideas about the transformative powers of technology. What is less understood is how users perceive technology and its effects on classroom dynamics such as student attendance and participation as well as student learning. The literature offers neither an empirical nor rhetorical consensus about the efficacy of classroom technology. This study explores perceptions about the effects of two commonly used technologies through surveys of faculty (n = 485) and students (n = 3145) at a large, public university. Results indicate that individual factors such as gender, grade point average, class/faculty rank, and length of tenure influence orientation toward technology. Results indicate student and faculty differ in their perceptions of the impact of technology on student attendance, class discussion, and connections between students. We explore potential reasons for these differences and how they provide clues for improving the usefulness of technology in meeting learning objectives for all students. (Contains 11 tables.)

Citation

Parker, R.E., Bianchi, A. & Cheah, T.Y. (2008). Perceptions of Instructional Technology: Factors of Influence and Anticipated Consequences. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 274-293. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75364/.

This record was imported from ERIC on April 18, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

• attendance
• College Faculty
• Computer Attitudes
• educational technology
• Influence of Technology
• Peer Relationship
• State Universities
• student attitudes
• Student Characteristics
• student participation
• teacher attitudes
• Teacher Characteristics
• Teacher Student Relationship
• undergraduate students