Abstract

The 2008 commercial video game "Spore" allowed more than a million players to design their own life forms. Starting from single-celled organisms players played through a caricature of natural history. Press coverage of the game's release offer two frames for thinking about the implications of the game. Some scientists and educators saw the game as a troubling teacher of intelligent design, while others suggested it might excite public interest in science. This paper explores the extent to which these two ways of thinking about the game are consistent with what players have done with the game in its online community. This analysis suggests that, at least for the players participating in this community, the game has not seduced them into believing in intelligent design. Instead the activities of these players suggest that the game has played a catalytic role in engaging the public with science. These findings indicate that designers of educational games may wish to consider more deeply tensions between prioritizing accuracy of content in educational games over player engagement.

Citation

Owens, T. (2012). Teaching Intelligent Design or Sparking Interest in Science? What Players Do with Will Wright's Spore. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(4), 857-868. Retrieved December 9, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/50182/.

This record was imported from ERIC on April 18, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

• community
• Computer Assisted Instruction
• computer games
• Computer Simulation
• Creationism
• educational games
• Evolution
• instructional design
• internet
• learner engagement
• News Reporting
• Science and Society
• science education
• Science Interests
• video games