You are here:

Applying constructionist principles to online teacher professional development
ARTICLE

, Athabasca University ; , Wayfinder Education Group ; , Athabasca University

IRRODL Volume 12, Number 6, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Full Text

Abstract

This report explores the first iteration of a teacher professional development courselet grounded in constructionist theory and activities. This online teacher professional development (oTPD) courselet provided opportunities for teachers to engage in just-in-time, ongoing TPD within a social networking site for educators. The topic of the oTPD was Robotics and Hands-on Activities in the Classroom. The courselet was designed for teachers who are interested in integrating constructionist pedagogies into their practice. Key findings of the first delivery of the oTPD courselet point to a need for flexible access, sharing of resources, and support for constructionist pedagogical activities as a PD value for participants. Findings further support the potential for an ongoing online community of practice around robotics in the classroom. The approach taken in this oTPD courselet of study continues to inform a model of oTPD delivery within a social-networking-enabled environment.

Citation

Ostashewski, N., Reid, D. & Moisey, S. (2011). Applying constructionist principles to online teacher professional development. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 143-156. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved March 22, 2023 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Alimisis, D. (2008). Designing robotics-enhanced constructivist training for science and technology teachers: The TERECoP project. In J. Luca& E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 288–293). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  2. Alimisis, D., Moro, M., Arlegui, J., Pina, A., Frangou, S., & Papanikolaou, K. (2007). Robotics and constructivism in education: The TERECoP project. In Ivan Kalas (Ed.), EuroLogo 2007: 40 Years of Influence on Education—Proceedings of the 11th European Logo Conference. Bratislava, Slovakia: Comenius University.
  3. Anderson, T. (2006). Higher education evolution: Individual freedom afforded by educational social software. In M. Beaudoin (Ed.), Perspectives on the future of higher education in the digital age (pp. 77–90). NY: Nova Science.
  4. Bers, M.U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002(1), 123–145.
  5. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
  6. Borko, H., Whitcomb, J., & Liston, D. (2009). Wicked problems and other thoughts on issues of technology and teacher learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 3–7.
  7. Chambers, J., & Carbonaro, M. (2003). Designing, developing, and implementing a course on LEGO robotics for technology teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(2), 209–241.
  8. Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19.
  9. Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
  10. Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
  11. Helps, R. (2007). Dancing on quicksand gracefully: Instructional design for rapidly evolving technology courses. In B. Sweeney, D. Feinstein, & J. Ekstrom (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 1–8). Destin, FL.
  12. Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Hoban, G., & Reid, D. (2009). Transfer of online professional learning to teachers’ classroom practice. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(2), 189–213.
  13. Hovorka, D., & Rees, M. (2009). Active collaboration learning environments: The class of Web 2.0. In H. Scheepers & M. Davern (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems: ACIS 2009 (pp. 550–561). Melbourne,
  14. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.) (1996). Constructionism in practice. NY: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Oliver, R., & Brook, C. (2002). Supporting the development of learning communities in online settings. In P. Barker& S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2002 (pp. 192–197). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  16. Ostashewski, N. (2010). Online technology teacher professional development courselets: Design and development. In D. Gibson& B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 2329–2334). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  17. Ostashewski, N., & Reid, D. (2010). Online teacher professional development: Redesign and delivery of a technological pedagogical courselet within a social networking site. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2010 (pp. 1111–1116). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  18. Papert, S. (1992). The children’s machine. NY: Basic Books.
  19. Papert, S. (1999). Logo philosophy and implementation. Montreal, QC: Logo Computer Systems Inc.
  20. Richards, D. (2009). Designing project-based courses with a focus on group formation and assessment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 9(1).
  21. Schwille, J., Dembélé, M., & Schubert, J. (2007). Global perspectives on teacher learning-Improving policy and practice. Fundamentals of Educational Planning, 84. Paris: UNESCO
  22. Siemens, G. (2005). A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 2(1), 3–10.
  23. Sprague, D. (2006). Research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Technology& Teacher Education, 14(4), 657-661.
  24. Stager, G. (2009). A constructionist approach to robotics. Paper presented at the 9th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education, Bento Gonçalves, Brazil.
  25. Toledo, C. (2007). Setting the stage to use blogging as a reflective tool in teacher education. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2111–2113). Chesapeake,
  26. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. (2003). Importance of design-based research for technologyenhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
  27. Whitehouse, P. (2010). Networked teacher professional development: The case of Globaloria. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 21(4).
  28. Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., McCloskey, E., Ketelhut, D.J., & Dede, C. (2006). An overview of current findings from empirical research on online teacher professional development. In C. Dede (Ed.), Online professional development for teachers: Emerging models and methods (pp. 13–30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  29. Whitehouse, P., Reynolds, R., & Caperton, I. (2009). Globaloria pilot year one: New directions for 21st-century teacher professional development. In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2009 (pp. 1590–1597). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Links

Also Read

Related Collections