The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context ARTICLE
IRRODL Volume 5, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press
This study reviewed the distance education and self-regulation literatures to identify learner self-regulation skills predictive of academic success in a blended education context. Five self-regulatory attributes were judged likely to be predictive of academic performance: intrinsic goal orientation, self-efficacy for learning and performance, time and study environment management, help seeking, and Internet self-efficacy. Verbal ability was used as a control measure. Performance was operationalized as final course grades. Data were collected from 94 students in a blended undergraduate marketing course at a west coast American research university (tier one). Regression analysis revealed that verbal ability and self-efficacy related significantly to performance, together explaining 12 percent of the variance in course grades. Self-efficacy for learning and performance alone accounted for 7 percent of the variance. Keywords: self-regulated learning, blended learning, online learning
Lynch, R. & Dembo, M. (2004). The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Online Learning in a Blended Learning Context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved November 16, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/49426/.
© 2004 Athabasca University Press
- Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F. And Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help Design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277 – 320.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
- Bates, A.W. (2000). Managing Technological Change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Bates, A.W. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. New York: Routledge.
- Beatty-Guenter, P. (2001). Distance education: does access override success? Paper presented Canadian Institutional Research and Planning Association 2001 conference. Victoria, British Columbia. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from: www.cirpaacpri.ca/prevConferences/victoria2001/papers/bg_paper.htm
- Council for Higher Education Accreditation. (2002). Accreditation and assuring quality in distance education. CHEA Monograph Series 2002, Number 1. Retrieved November 14, 2003, from: http://www.chea.org/Research/ Curry, J., Haderlie, S., and Ku, T. (1999). Specified learning goals and their effect on learners’ representations of a hypertext reading environment. International Journal of Instructional Media 26(1), 43 – 51.
- Diaz, D.P. (2000). Commentary– Carving a new path for distance education research. The Technology Source March/ April. Retrieved November 14, 2003, from: http://technologysource.org/article/carving_a_new_path_for_distance_education_researc H/
- Doherty, P.B. (1998). Learner control in asynchronous learning environments. Asynchronous Learning Networks Magazine, 2(2). Retrieved January 31, 2004, from: http://www.aln.org/publications/magazine/v2n2/doherty.aspEastin,M.S.,andLaRose,R.(2000).Internetself-efficacyandthepsychologyofthedigitaldivide.JournalofComputerMediatedCommunication,6(1).RetrievedNovember14,2003,from:http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html
- Gibson, C.C. (1998). The distance learner’s academic self-concept. In C.C. Gibson (Ed.) Distance learners in higher education: institutional responses for quality outcomes (P. 65-76). Madison, WI.: Atwood Publishing.
- Hara, N., and Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a web-based distance education course. CSI Working Paper. The Center for Social Informatics, Indiana University. Retrieved November 14, 2003, from: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/wp00-01.html
- Henderson, R.W., and Cunningham, L. (1994). Creating interactive socio-cultural environments for self-regulated learning. In D.H. Schunk and B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.) Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications (P. 255-281).
- Joo, Y., Bong, M., and Choi, H. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic selfefficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 48(2), 5 – 17.
- Jung, I. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of web-based instruction in the context of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 525 – 534.
- Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.
- Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education, (3rd edition). London: Routledge.
- Linnenbrink, E.A., and Pintrich, P.R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. The School Psychology Review 31(3): 313 – 327.
- Moore, M.G. (1998). Introduction. In C.C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: institutional responses for quality outcomes (P. 1-7). Madison, WI.: Atwood Publishing.
- Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (P. 22-38). London: Routledge.
- Moore, M.G., and Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A systems view. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.
- Olgren, C.H. (1998). The effects of learning strategies and motivation. In C.C. Gibson (Ed.) Distance learners in higher education: institutional responses for quality outcomes (P. 77-96). Madison, WI.: Atwood Publishing.
- Palloff, R.M., and Pratt, K. (1999). Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Peters, O. (1998). Learning and Teaching in Distance Education: Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. London: Kogan Page.
- Phipps, R., and Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, D.C.: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
- Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of Self-Regulation (P. 452-502). San Diego,
- Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). 91-B-004. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
- Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801 – 813.
- Roblyer, M.D. (1999). Is Choice Important in Distance Learning? A study of student motives for taking Internet-based courses at the high school and community college levels. Journal of Research on Computing Education, 32(1), 157 – 171.
- Saba, F. (2000). Research in Distance Education: What is research? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 1(1), Retrieved January 28, 2004, from: www.irrodl.org/content/v1.1/farhad.html
- Schubert, H.J.P. (1986). Schubert general ability battery manual. East Aurora, NY.: Slosson.
- Schrum, L. (1998). On-line Education: Astudy of emerging pedagogy. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 78, 53 – 61.
- Schrum, L., and Hong, S. (2002). Dimensions and Strategies for Online Success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1). Retrieved November 14, 2003, from: http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/index.asp
- Sikora, A.C., and Carroll, C.D. (2002). A Profile of Participation in Distance Education: 19992000.National Center for Education Statistics. NCES 2003-154. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved November 14, 2003, from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003154
- Whipp, J.L., and Chiarelli, S. (2001). Proposal: Self-regulation in web-based courses for teachers. Retrieved November 14, 2003, from: http://edtech.connect.msu.edu/Searchaera2002/viewproposaltext.asp?propID=1696 Winne, P.H., and Perry, N.E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (P. 532-566). San Diego,
- Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: an overview. Theory into Practice,41(2), 64 – 70.
- Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (P. 13-39).
- Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81(3), 329 – 339.
- Zimmerman, B.J., and Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies, American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614 – 628.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.
Ron Owston, York University, Canada
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 17, No. 1 (January 2018) pp. 65–83
Giovanna Berizzi, Eugenia Di Barbora & Maddalena Vulcani
Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 13, No. 3 (Sep 30, 2017)
Fethi Inan, Texas Tech University, United States; Erman Yukselturk, Kirikkale University, Turkey; Murat Kurucay, Bulent Ecevit University, Turkey; Raymond Flores, Texas Tech University, United States
International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 16, No. 1 (February 2017) pp. 23–32
Mehmet Firat, Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty
Open Praxis Vol. 8, No. 3 (Aug 22, 2016) pp. 191–201
Evaluation of Online Log Variables that Estimate Learners’ Time Management in a Korean Online Learning Context
Il-Hyun Jo & Yeonjeong Park, Ewha Womans University; Meehyun Yoon, University of Georgia; Hanall Sung, Ewha Womans University
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 17, No. 1 (Feb 02, 2016)
Farivar Rahimi, University of Limpopo, South Africa
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2013 (Jun 24, 2013) pp. 2514–2523
Emmanuelle Quillerou, UMR M_101 AMURE, Ifremer Brest Département d'Economie Maritime, Technopole de Brest-Iroise, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, France
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 12, No. 6 (Sep 22, 2011) pp. 178–197
The Correlation between Student’s Demographic Information and Self-regulated Learning Strategy toward Online Learning Environments among Thai Students in USA (A Pilot Study)
Buncha Samruayruen, University of North Texas, United States; Direk Teeraputon & Kingkaew Samruayruen, Naresuan University, Thailand
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 868–878
When Online Learning is Truly Online: An Argument Against Including Models that Advocate Blended Learning in the Design for E-Classes in Higher Education
Ron McBride & Fuller Frank, Northwestern State University, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (Mar 03, 2008) pp. 557–561
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.