You are here:

A view into teachers digital pedagogical portfolios showing evidence of their Technological Pedagogical Reasoning PROCEEDINGS

, , , Griffith University, Australia

AACE Award

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-02-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper is a report on the findings of a study undertaken with a number of teachers who have completed their SMART Classrooms Professional Development Framework - Digital Pedagogical License (SCPDF-DPL). These SCPDF-DPL’s provide rich descriptions of a teacher’s professional values, relationships, knowledge and practice with using digital technologies. This study extends Shulman’s (1986, 1987) work on pedagogical reasoning to include technology. The aim of this study is to understand how teachers, across various career stages, reason with technology. As part of this research project, teachers have given access to their online SCDPL-Digital Pedagogical License. These SCPDF-DPLs were reviewed using Shulman’s Model of Pedagogical Reasoning and Action as a lens. Findings indicate there is evidence of Pedagogical Reasoning with technology embedded in the portfolios of these four experienced teachers.

Citation

Smart, V., Sim, C. & Finger, G. (2013). A view into teachers digital pedagogical portfolios showing evidence of their Technological Pedagogical Reasoning. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3380-3387). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 15, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2011). National Professional Standards for Teachers. Canbera: AITSL. Ç imer S. Odaba(cid:1)ı. (2011). The effect of portfolios on students' learning: student teachers' views. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 161-176. , & Willis, Elizabeth. (2001). Through the looking glass… preservice professional portfolio 'S. The Teacher Educator, 37(1), 27-36. Doi:10.1080/08878730109555278Departmentof Education and Training. (2012a). ELearning Frameworks. Retrieved 25/10/2012, from http://education.qld.gov.au/smartclassrooms/developing-professionals/elearning-frameworks/index.htmlDepartmentofEducationandTraining.(2012b).SMARTClassrooms-Astrategyfor2011-2014.Retrieved25/10/2012,fromhttp://education.qld.gov.au/smartclassrooms/strategy/index.html
  2. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2011). Digital Education Revolution. Retrieved 5/10/2011, from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/Pages/default.aspxDepartmentofEducationTrainingandEmployment.(2012a).Aboutthestrategy.Retrieved25/10/2012,fromhttp://education.qld.gov.au/smartclassrooms/strategy/index.html
  3. Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. EDUCASE Learning Initative, Ç evrimiç i sü rü m, 9, 2011. Ministerial Council for Education Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA). (2011). Release of national standards for initial teacher education programs [Press release]. Retrieved 25/10/2012, from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/verve/_resources/MCEECDYA_-_Initial_Teacher_Education_-_Media_Release.pdf Moyle, K., & Owens, S. (2009). Listening to students' and educators' voices: The views of students and early career educators about learning with technologies in Australian education and training. Canberra: Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations, Retrieved from http://www.deewr.gov.au And
  4. Nodoye, A, Ritzhaupt, A.D., & Parker, M.A. (2012). Use of ePortfolios in K-12 Teacher Hiring in North Carolina: Perspectives of School Principals. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 7(4), 1-10.
  5. OECD. (2005). Are Students Ready for a Technology-Rich World? What PISA Studies Tell Us. Paris: OECD.
  6. Queensland College of Teachers. (2009). Professional Standards for Queensland Teachers (Graduate Level): A guide for use with preservice teachers. Brisbane: Retrieved from http://www.qct.edu.au/standards/documents/PSQT_GradLevel_v3_Web.pdf. Rolheiser, Carol, & Schwartz, Susan. (2001). Pre-Service Portfolios: A Base for Professional Growth. Canadian Journal of Education/ Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 26(3), 283-300.
  7. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 414.
  8. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-21.
  9. Smart, V., Sim, C., & Finger, G. (2012). ACEC2012-It’ s Time To Technological Pedagogical Reason. Paper presented at the ACEC2012: ITs Time Conference, Perth. Http://acec2012.acce.edu.au/its-time-teacherstechnological-pedagogical-reason

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.